[Paper Review] A Method for Unknotting Torus Knots
This paper presents a systematic method to identify minimal unknotting crossing changes in torus knots and links using braid group theory and Markov moves. It provides a constructive algorithm to locate exactly (p−1)(q−1)/2 crossings in the braid closure of B(p,q) whose sign flips yield the unknot, and proves the symmetry K(p,q) ∼ K(q,p) via Markov equivalence, offering a concrete, patterned alternative to brute-force crossing selection.
Unknotting numbers for torus knots and links are well known. In this paper, we present a method for determining the position of unknotting number crossing changes in a toric braid B(p, q) such that the closure of the resultant braid is equivalent to the trivial knot or link. Also, we provide a simple proof for the important result K(p, q) \sim K(q, p) using the results obtained from this method.
Motivation & Objective
- To develop a constructive method for identifying the precise positions of (p−1)(q−1)/2 crossing changes in the braid B(p,q) that unknot the closure of the braid.
- To provide a simple, pattern-based proof of the symmetry K(p,q) ∼ K(q,p) for torus knots using the proposed unknotting method.
- To extend the minimal unknotting crossing data method from torus knots to torus links, particularly when gcd(p,q) = d > 1.
- To offer a computationally efficient alternative to generic unknotting procedures that rely on ascending/descending diagram conversion without pattern.
Proposed method
- The method uses the braid group B_p and the standard toric braid B(p,q) = (σ₁σ₂⋯σ_{p−1})^q, whose closure is the torus knot K(p,q).
- It defines a specific set of crossings, called the U-crossing data, based on a recursive structure involving σ_i and their inverses, which are candidates for unknotting.
- The method applies Markov moves to transform the braid after crossing changes, showing that the resulting braid is Markov equivalent to a simpler braid, ultimately proving it is trivial.
- For torus links with gcd(p,q) = d > 1, the method uses Euclid’s algorithm to decompose the braid into simpler components, each of which is handled via the same unknotting logic.
- The algorithm is implemented in MATLAB (Appendix A), taking p and q as input to output two distinct minimal unknotting crossing sets.
- The proof of symmetry K(p,q) ∼ K(q,p) relies on showing that changing crossings in B(p,a) based on U(B(p,a)) yields a braid Markov equivalent to B(a,p−a).
Experimental results
Research questions
- RQ1How can one systematically identify the exact positions of (p−1)(q−1)/2 crossings in the braid B(p,q) whose sign flips result in a trivial knot?
- RQ2Can the symmetry K(p,q) ∼ K(q,p) for torus knots be proven using braid group relations and Markov moves rather than topological invariants?
- RQ3What is the minimal unknotting crossing data for torus links K(p,q) when gcd(p,q) > 1, and how can it be constructed from simpler components?
- RQ4Is there a patterned, non-brute-force method to find minimal unknotting crossing data in torus knots, avoiding the inefficiency of ascending/descending diagram conversion?
- RQ5How can the unknotting process for torus knots be extended to torus links using recursive decomposition and Markov equivalence?
Key findings
- The U-crossing data for B(p,q) is a minimal unknotting crossing data if and only if q ≡ 1 or p−1 (mod p), providing a precise condition for validity.
- The unknotting number of a torus knot K(p,q) is exactly (p−1)(q−1)/2, and this number of crossing changes suffices to unknot the closure of B(p,q) when applied at the U-crossing data positions.
- The method proves that K(p,q) ∼ K(q,p) via Markov equivalence: changing crossings in B(p,a) based on U(B(p,a)) yields a braid Markov equivalent to B(a,p−a).
- For torus links K(p,p), the U-crossing data of B(p,p) is minimal and yields a trivial link, with |U(B(p,p))| = (p−1)p/2 crossings.
- For general torus links K(p,q) with gcd(p,q) = d > 1, the method decomposes the braid using Euclid’s algorithm and constructs minimal unknotting data by combining results from subcomponents.
- The MATLAB implementation in Appendix A successfully computes two distinct minimal unknotting crossing sets for any K(p,q), confirming the theoretical results computationally.
Better researchstarts right now
From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.
No credit card · Free plan available
This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.