[Paper Review] Asymptotic minimaxity of False Discovery Rate thresholding for sparse exponential data
This paper establishes the asymptotic minimaxity of False Discovery Rate (FDR) thresholding for estimating sparse exponential means, showing that FDR control with q ≤ 1/2 yields nearly optimal estimation performance in terms of mean-squared error on the log-scale. The method adaptively thresholds data to recover signals in high-dimensional, sparse exponential models, with risk approaching the minimax lower bound as sparsity increases (η → 0).
We apply FDR thresholding to a non-Gaussian vector whose coordinates X_i, i=1,..., n, are independent exponential with individual means $\mu_i$. The vector $\mu =(\mu_i)$ is thought to be sparse, with most coordinates 1 but a small fraction significantly larger than 1; roughly, most coordinates are simply `noise,' but a small fraction contain `signal.' We measure risk by per-coordinate mean-squared error in recovering $\log(\mu_i)$, and study minimax estimation over parameter spaces defined by constraints on the per-coordinate p-norm of $\log(\mu_i)$: $\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n\log^p(\mu_i)\leq \eta^p$. We show for large n and small $\eta$ that FDR thresholding can be nearly Minimax. The FDR control parameter 0<q<1 plays an important role: when $q\leq 1/2$, the FDR estimator is nearly minimax, while choosing a fixed q>1/2 prevents near minimaxity. These conclusions mirror those found in the Gaussian case in Abramovich et al. [Ann. Statist. 34 (2006) 584--653]. The techniques developed here seem applicable to a wide range of other distributional assumptions, other loss measures and non-i.i.d. dependency structures.
Motivation & Objective
- To study minimax estimation of sparse exponential means where most µi = 1 but a few are significantly larger.
- To evaluate the performance of FDR thresholding as a data-adaptive estimation rule under ℓp-constrained sparsity.
- To determine under what conditions FDR thresholding achieves asymptotic minimax risk in non-Gaussian, sparse exponential models.
- To generalize results from Gaussian settings to exponential noise, focusing on log-scale loss and thresholding rules.
- To establish conditions under which FDR thresholding is asymptotically minimax, particularly the role of the FDR control parameter q.
Proposed method
- Models observations Xi ∼ Exp(µi) with sparse µi, where most µi = 1 and a small fraction are >1, constrained by ℓp-norm on log(µi).
- Measures estimation risk via per-coordinate mean-squared error on the log-scale: (1/n)∑(log ˆµi − log µi)².
- Defines minimax risk R∗n as the infimum over all estimators of the worst-case risk over ℓp-balls of radius η.
- Proposes FDR thresholding estimator ˆµFDR,q,n using data-dependent threshold tFDR = X(kFDR), where kFDR is the largest k with X(k) ≥ −log(qk/n).
- Applies Simes' procedure to control FDR at level q, ensuring expected proportion of false discoveries ≤ q.
- Analyzes asymptotic behavior as n → ∞ followed by η → 0, using extreme value theory and empirical process tools on order statistics.
Experimental results
Research questions
- RQ1Under what conditions is FDR thresholding asymptotically minimax for sparse exponential data?
- RQ2How does the choice of FDR control parameter q affect the minimax risk of the FDR estimator?
- RQ3Can FDR thresholding achieve near-optimal estimation performance in non-Gaussian, sparse models with heavy-tailed or non-normal noise?
- RQ4What is the role of the sparsity parameter η and the ℓp-norm constraint in determining the minimax risk and estimator performance?
- RQ5How does FDR thresholding compare to oracle thresholding and other adaptive estimation rules in high-dimensional sparse exponential models?
Key findings
- When 0 < q ≤ 1/2, the FDR estimator ˆµFDR,q,n is asymptotically minimax: the ratio of its worst-case risk to the minimax risk tends to 1 as n → ∞ and η → 0.
- When q > 1/2, the FDR estimator is not asymptotically minimax, and the risk ratio converges to q/(1−q) > 1, indicating a strict performance gap.
- The minimax risk R∗n(Mn,p(η)) behaves asymptotically as ηp log²⁻ᵖ log(1/η), establishing the sharp rate of convergence.
- The optimal threshold t0(p,η) for oracle thresholding scales as p log(1/η) + p log log(1/η) · (1 + o(1)) as η → 0.
- FDR thresholding performs well even in finite samples, with empirical risk close to η log log(1/η) for q < 1/2 and increasing only moderately for q near 1/2.
- The method extends to other non-Gaussian models, including sparse Poisson means and additive noise with Gumbel or double-exponential distributions, provided tails are light enough.
Better researchstarts right now
From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.
No credit card · Free plan available
This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.