[Paper Review] Curve counting on elliptic Calabi-Yau threefolds via derived categories
This paper proves that the generating series of Pandharipande–Thomas invariants for an elliptic Calabi–Yau threefold with a reduced class in the base satisfies the elliptic transformation law of Jacobi forms, establishing a deep modular structure. Using a derived auto-equivalence and wall-crossing techniques, the authors express PT invariants in terms of Gromov–Witten invariants and universal Jacobi forms, proving the series is a quasi-Jacobi form of weight -10 for K3×E and providing strong evidence for the Igusa cusp form conjecture.
We prove the elliptic transformation law of Jacobi forms for the generating series of Pandharipande--Thomas invariants of an elliptic Calabi--Yau 3-fold over a reduced class in the base. This proves part of a conjecture by Huang, Katz, and Klemm. For the proof we construct an involution of the derived category and use wall-crossing methods. We express the generating series of PT invariants in terms of low genus Gromov--Witten invariants and universal Jacobi forms. As applications we prove new formulas and recover several known formulas for the PT invariants of $\mathrm{K3} imes E$, abelian 3-folds, and the STU-model. We prove that the generating series of curve counting invariants for $\mathrm{K3} imes E$ with respect to a primitive class on the $\mathrm{K3}$ is a quasi-Jacobi form of weight -10. This provides strong evidence for the Igusa cusp form conjecture.
Motivation & Objective
- To understand how derived auto-equivalences constrain curve counting invariants on Calabi–Yau threefolds.
- To verify the Huang–Katz–Klemm conjecture on the modular properties of generating series of Pandharipande–Thomas invariants.
- To establish a connection between derived categories and Jacobi forms in the context of curve counting.
- To provide new computational tools for PT invariants using wall-crossing and Gromov–Witten theory.
- To offer strong evidence for the Igusa cusp form conjecture via the case of K3×E.
Proposed method
- Construct an involution on the derived category of coherent sheaves on the elliptic Calabi–Yau threefold.
- Use wall-crossing techniques to relate Pandharipande–Thomas invariants to Gromov–Witten invariants.
- Express the generating series of PT invariants as a ratio of modular forms and Jacobi forms.
- Apply the theory of Jacobi forms to derive the elliptic transformation law for the generating series.
- Use degeneration arguments and Gromov–Witten theory to compute invariants in abelian threefolds and K3×E.
- Leverage the GW/PT correspondence and known formulas for universal Jacobi forms to derive explicit expressions.
Experimental results
Research questions
- RQ1How do derived auto-equivalences affect curve counting invariants on Calabi–Yau threefolds?
- RQ2Does the generating series of Pandharipande–Thomas invariants for an elliptic Calabi–Yau threefold exhibit modular properties as predicted by Huang, Katz, and Klemm?
- RQ3Is the generating series of PT invariants for K3×E with a primitive class on K3 a quasi-Jacobi form of weight -10?
- RQ4Can wall-crossing and derived categories be used to compute PT invariants in terms of Gromov–Witten invariants?
- RQ5Do the results support the Igusa cusp form conjecture?
Key findings
- The generating series of PT invariants for a reduced class H in the base of an elliptic Calabi–Yau threefold satisfies the elliptic transformation law of Jacobi forms of index h−1, where h is the arithmetic genus of H.
- The series Z_H(q,t) = PT_H(q,t)/PT_0(q,t) is a quasi-Jacobi form of weight -10 for K3×E with a primitive class on K3, providing strong evidence for the Igusa cusp form conjecture.
- For K3×E with a primitive class H_1 of genus 1, the generating series is PT_H_1(q,t) = 24 · Δ(t)⁻¹ · ℘(q,t), where Δ(t) is the modular discriminant and ℘(q,t) is a Jacobi form.
- For abelian threefolds A×E with a class H of genus 2, the generating series is PT^A×E_2(q,t) = φ_{-2,1}(q,t), a standard Jacobi form of weight -2 and index 1.
- For genus 3 classes on A×E, assuming the GW/PT correspondence, the series is PT^A×E_3(q,t) = 12·℘(q,t)·φ_{-2,1}(q,t)² − ϑ_{D4}(t)·φ_{-2,1}(q,t)², where ϑ_{D4}(t) is a theta function.
- The Euler characteristic version of the generating series on A×E for genus 3 is not modular, indicating that modularity does not extend to the naive Euler characteristic.
Better researchstarts right now
From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.
No credit card · Free plan available
This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.