[Paper Review] Double logarithmic stability estimate in the identification of a scalar potential by a partial elliptic Dirichlet-to-Neumann map
This paper establishes a double logarithmic stability estimate for the inverse problem of identifying a scalar potential in a stationary Schrödinger equation from a partial Dirichlet-to-Neumann map. Using complex geometric optics solutions and Alessandrini's identity, the authors derive stability bounds in $L^2$ and $H^{-1}$ norms, showing that the potential difference is controlled by a double-logarithmic term of the DN map norm, under Sobolev and $L^∞$ regularity constraints.
We examine the stability issue in the inverse problem of determining a scalar potential appearing in the stationary Schr{ö}dinger equation in a bounded domain, from a partial elliptic Dirichlet-to-Neumann map. Namely, the Dirichlet data is imposed on the shadowed face of the boundary of the domain and the Neumann data is measured on its illuminated face. We establish a log log stability estimate for the L2-norm (resp. the H minus 1-norm) of bounded (resp. L2) potentials whose difference is lying in any Sobolev space of order positive order.
Motivation & Objective
- To establish stability estimates for the inverse problem of recovering a scalar potential from partial boundary measurements in the Schrödinger equation.
- To quantify the dependence of the potential reconstruction error on the measurement error from a partial Dirichlet-to-Neumann map.
- To extend stability results to both $L^2$ and $H^{-1}$ norms of the potential difference under regularity constraints.
- To provide a theoretical foundation for the uniqueness and stability of inverse problems in partial data settings with applications to conductivity imaging.
Proposed method
- The authors use complex geometric optics (CGO) solutions that vanish on a portion of the boundary to probe the potential.
- They apply Alessandrini's identity to relate the difference of DN maps to the potential difference via integral identities.
- Fourier coefficient bounds are derived in a carefully chosen frequency set to control the solution behavior.
- Stability inequalities are established through energy estimates and interpolation techniques in Sobolev spaces.
- The method relies on transposition solutions in $H_{\Delta}(\Omega)$ and the boundedness of the DN map in $H^{-1/2}(\Gamma)$ and $H^{1/2}(G)$.
- The proof is extended to the conductivity problem via a change of variables and transformation of the DN map.
Experimental results
Research questions
- RQ1Can a double logarithmic stability estimate be established for the inverse problem of identifying a scalar potential from partial Dirichlet-to-Neumann data?
- RQ2How does the stability of the potential reconstruction depend on the regularity of the potential and the measurement error?
- RQ3What is the optimal stability rate achievable when only partial boundary data is available?
- RQ4Can the stability result be extended to the $H^{-1}$ norm and $L^\infty$ regularity of the potential?
- RQ5How does the stability estimate relate to the conductivity inverse problem under partial measurements?
Key findings
- The paper establishes a double logarithmic stability estimate: $\|q_1 - q_2\|_{L^2(\Omega)} \leq c\left(\|\widetilde{\Lambda}_{q_1,q_2}\| + \left|\ln \tilde{c} \left|\ln \|\widetilde{\Lambda}_{q_1,q_2}\|\right|\right|^{-t}\right)$ for $t > 0$.
- For the $H^{-1}$ norm, the stability estimate is $\|q_1 - q_2\|_{H^{-1}(\Omega)} \leq c\left(\|\widetilde{\Lambda}_{q_1,q_2}\| + \left|\ln \tilde{c} \left|\ln \|\widetilde{\Lambda}_{q_1,q_2}\|\right|\right|^{-1}\right)$.
- The stability constants $c$ and $\tilde{c}$ depend only on the regularity bounds $\delta$ and the Sobolev index $t$.
- The result holds under the conditions that $q_1, q_2 \in \mathcal{Q} \cap \delta B_{L^\infty(\Omega)}$ and $(q_2 - q_1)\chi_\Omega \in \delta B_{H^t(\mathbb{R}^n)}$.
- An application to the conductivity problem yields a similar double logarithmic stability estimate for the difference of conductivities in $L^2$.
- The stability estimate is robust under the assumption that conductivities and their normal derivatives agree on the boundary and on the illuminated face, respectively.
Better researchstarts right now
From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.
No credit card · Free plan available
This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.