Skip to main content
QUICK REVIEW

[Paper Review] Embedding the diamond graph in $L_p$ and dimension reduction in $L_1$

J. R. Lee, Assaf Naor|ArXiv.org|Jul 30, 2004
Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation5 references46 citations
TL;DR

This paper establishes a lower bound on the distortion required to embed the level-$k$ diamond graph into $L_p$ spaces for $1 < p \leq 2$, showing it is at least $\sqrt{1 + (p-1)k}$. This result implies that any $D$-embedding of such graphs into $\ell_1^d$ requires dimension $d \geq n^{\Omega(1/D^2)}$, proving that no $L_1$ analogue of the Johnson-Lindenstrauss dimension reduction lemma exists.

ABSTRACT

We show that any embedding of the level-k diamond graph of Newman and Rabinovich into $L_p$, $1 &lt; p \le 2$, requires distortion at least $\sqrt{k(p-1) + 1}$. An immediate consequence is that there exist arbitrarily large n-point sets $X \subseteq L_1$ such that any D-embedding of X into $\ell_1^d$ requires $d \geq n^{Ω(1/D^2)}$. This gives a simple proof of the recent result of Brinkman and Charikar which settles the long standing question of whether there is an $L_1$ analogue of the Johnson-Lindenstrauss dimension reduction lemma.

Motivation & Objective

  • To establish a lower bound on the distortion required to embed the diamond graph $G_k$ into $L_p$ for $1 < p \leq 2$.
  • To demonstrate that $L_1$ does not admit dimension reduction analogous to the Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma.
  • To provide a geometric, non-linear programming-based proof of the impossibility of $L_1$ dimension reduction.
  • To show that arbitrarily large $n$-point subsets of $L_1$ require super-polynomial dimension for constant-distortion embeddings into $\ell_1^d$.

Proposed method

  • Uses a generalized short diagonals inequality in $L_p$ for $1 < p \leq 2$, extending the classical $p=2$ case.
  • Applies the inequality to anti-edges and edges in the diamond graph construction at each level $i$.
  • Derives a recursive inequality relating the $L_p$-distances of anti-edges and edges across levels.
  • Employs convexity and averaging to bound the sum of squared distances over anti-edges in terms of edge distances.
  • Combines the inequality with the non-expansive $D$-embedding assumption to derive a distortion lower bound.
  • Translates the $L_p$ distortion bound into a lower bound on the dimension $d$ required for embedding into $\ell_1^d$.

Experimental results

Research questions

  • RQ1What is the minimum distortion required to embed the level-$k$ diamond graph into $L_p$ for $1 < p \leq 2$?
  • RQ2Can the Johnson-Lindenstrauss dimension reduction lemma be extended to $L_1$ spaces?
  • RQ3What is the relationship between the distortion of $L_p$ embeddings and the dimension of the target $\ell_1^d$ space?
  • RQ4How does the rate of decay of distortion as $p \to 1$ affect the required embedding dimension in $\ell_1$?
  • RQ5Can geometric intuition replace linear programming in proving lower bounds for $L_1$ dimension reduction?

Key findings

  • The distortion of any embedding of the level-$k$ diamond graph into $L_p$ for $1 < p \leq 2$ is at least $\sqrt{1 + (p-1)k}$.
  • For every $n \in \mathbb{N}$, there exists an $n$-point subset $X \subseteq L_1$ such that any $D$-embedding into $\ell_1^d$ requires $d \geq n^{\Omega(1/D^2)}$.
  • The lower bound on distortion in $L_p$ directly implies the impossibility of $L_1$ dimension reduction analogous to the Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma.
  • The proof relies on a novel geometric inequality in $L_p$ spaces, avoiding linear programming techniques used in prior work.
  • The result confirms that $L_1$ does not support efficient dimension reduction, even for sets with $L_1$-embeddable metrics.
  • The bound $d \geq n^{\Omega(1/D^2)}$ is tight up to the constant in the exponent, as shown by the construction and asymptotic analysis.

Better researchstarts right now

From paper design to paper writing, dramatically reduce your research time.

No credit card · Free plan available

This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.