Skip to main content
QUICK REVIEW

[Paper Review] Finite Element Solution of the Two-Dimensional Bates Model for Option Pricing Under Stochastic Volatility and Jumps

Neda Bagheri Renani, Sevcovic, Daniel|arXiv (Cornell University)|Feb 22, 2026
Stochastic processes and financial applications0 citations
TL;DR

The paper develops a fourth-order compact finite-difference (HOC-FD) scheme for the transformed Bates PIDE, using an IMEX-CN time discretization and Simpson quadrature for jump integrals, and benchmarks it against second-order FD and quadratic FEM to demonstrate superior efficiency with comparable accuracy.

ABSTRACT

We propose a fourth--order compact finite--difference (HOC--FD) scheme for the transformed Bates partial integro--differential equation (PIDE). The method employs an implicit--explicit (IMEX) Crank--Nicolson framework for local terms and Simpson quadrature for the jump integral. Benchmarks against second--order finite differences (FD) and quadratic finite elements (FEM, p=2) confirm near--fourth--order spatial accuracy for HOC--FD, near--second--order for FEM, and second--order temporal convergence for all time integrators. Efficiency tests show that HOC--FD achieves similar accuracy at up to two orders of magnitude lower runtime than FEM, establishing it as a practical baseline for option pricing under stochastic volatility jump--diffusion models.

Motivation & Objective

  • Motivate accurate numerical pricing under stochastic volatility with jumps as in the Bates model.
  • Develop a high-order compact finite-difference scheme for the transformed Bates PIDE.
  • Assess accuracy and efficiency against standard second-order FD and quadratic FEM.
  • Show that HOC-FD achieves near-fourth-order spatial accuracy with competitive computational cost.

Proposed method

  • Transform Bates PIDE to a backward-time, normalized form suitable for numerics.
  • Apply a fourth-order compact discretization for the local differential operator on a 3x3 stencil.
  • Treat the local operator implicitly and the jump integral explicitly via an IMEX–Crank–Nicolson scheme.
  • Approximate the nonlocal jump term with Simpson quadrature over a truncated interval.
  • Benchmark HOC-FD against second-order FD and FEM (P2) in terms of accuracy (L2 and RMSE) and efficiency (DOF, CPU time).
Figure 1: European put price $V(S,t)$ under the Bates model for $S\in[70,130]$ . The intrinsic payoff $\max(K-S,0)$ and the no-arbitrage lower bound $\max\{Ke^{-rT}-S,0\}$ are shown as reference curves
Figure 1: European put price $V(S,t)$ under the Bates model for $S\in[70,130]$ . The intrinsic payoff $\max(K-S,0)$ and the no-arbitrage lower bound $\max\{Ke^{-rT}-S,0\}$ are shown as reference curves

Experimental results

Research questions

  • RQ1Can a fourth-order compact finite-difference scheme accurately solve the Bates PIDE on structured grids?
  • RQ2How does HOC-FD compare to standard second-order FD and FEM(P2) in spatial/temporal accuracy and computational cost?
  • RQ3Is the IMEX–Crank–Nicolson approach with explicit jump treatment stable and efficient for Bates-type models?
  • RQ4What are the efficiency gains of HOC-FD relative to FEM(P2) for European option pricing under stochastic volatility with jumps?

Key findings

  • HOC-FD achieves near-fourth-order spatial accuracy, while FEM attains near-second-order accuracy in space.
  • All time integrators yield about second-order temporal convergence.
  • HOC-FD delivers substantial efficiency gains, with runtime often two orders of magnitude faster than FEM(P2) at comparable accuracy.
  • Compared with second-order FD, HOC-FD and its peers show significantly better cost-accuracy balance on structured grids.

Better researchstarts right now

From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.

No credit card · Free plan available

This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.