[Paper Review] Information Constraints on Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes
Introduces HSIC-constrained VAEs (HCV) that penalize dependence in aggregated posteriors using dHSIC to enforce independence among latent components, with applications to interpretable, invariant, and denoised representations, including scRNA-seq analysis.
Parameterizing the approximate posterior of a generative model with neural networks has become a common theme in recent machine learning research. While providing appealing flexibility, this approach makes it difficult to impose or assess structural constraints such as conditional independence. We propose a framework for learning representations that relies on Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes and whose search space is constrained via kernel-based measures of independence. In particular, our method employs the $d$-variable Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (dHSIC) to enforce independence between the latent representations and arbitrary nuisance factors. We show how to apply this method to a range of problems, including the problems of learning invariant representations and the learning of interpretable representations. We also present a full-fledged application to single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). In this setting the biological signal is mixed in complex ways with sequencing errors and sampling effects. We show that our method out-performs the state-of-the-art in this domain.
Motivation & Objective
- Motivate the need for latent representations with specific independence properties beyond traditional graphical-model constraints.
- Propose a framework to constrain aggregated posteriors in VAEs using kernel-based dependence measures.
- Introduce HSIC-Constrained VAE (HCV) by penalizing the ELBO with HSIC to enforce independence among latent subsets.
- Demonstrate the method on tasks of learning interpretable representations, invariant representations, and denoising single-cell RNA sequencing data.
Proposed method
- Review variational auto-encoder (VAE) and aggregated posterior q_hat_phi(Z) as the mixture over data.
- Introduce HSIC and its d-variate generalization (dHSIC) as kernel-based dependence measures.
- Define HSIC-constrained VAE (HCV) by maximizing the ELBO with a penalty proportional to HSIC between selected latent components (and optional nuisances).
- Justify the penalty as a lower bound on log-likelihood and highlight minibatch-compatible estimation of HSIC.
- Show that HSIC penalties can encompass and relate to existing invariance approaches (e.g., MMD-based methods) under certain kernel choices.
- Illustrate training and computational considerations, including kernel choices, batch settings, and the impact on the variational posterior.
Experimental results
Research questions
- RQ1Can HSIC-based penalties enforce desired independence between latent coordinates in VAEs?
- RQ2How does HCV compare to existing disentanglement/invariance approaches (e.g., beta-VAE, beta-TCVAE, VFAE) in terms of representation quality and reconstruction?
- RQ3Can HCV improve downstream tasks such as interpretable factor discovery, invariance to nuisances, and denoising in real-world data?
- RQ4What is the impact of the HSIC penalty on the ELBO, correlations in the aggregated posterior, and computational efficiency?
- RQ5How does HCV perform on complex biological data such as single-cell RNA sequencing for denoising and hypothesis testing?
Key findings
- HCV achieves higher ELBO values (better model fit) while attaining lower dependence (as measured by HSIC) in the aggregated posterior than baselines like beta-VAE and beta-TCVAE in a linear Gaussian setup.
- On interpretable representation learning, HSIC-based penalties yield favorable trade-offs between reconstruction quality and independence compared to existing disentanglement methods.
- On invariant representation learning with lighting-contaminated face data, HCV produces representations that are more invariant to nuisance lighting while preserving identity information.
- In scRNA-seq denoising, HCV reduces dependence of latent space on quality-control nuisance metrics and improves Bayesian hypothesis testing performance (higher correlation with microarray results via IDR) compared with scVI, indicating more biologically interpretable latent factors.
- Overall, the HSIC penalty provides a scalable, minibatch-compatible way to enforce independence in latent representations without requiring full joint distribution estimates.
Better researchstarts right now
From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.
No credit card · Free plan available
This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.