Skip to main content
QUICK REVIEW

[Paper Review] Intrinsically knotted graphs with 21 edges

Jamison Barsotti, Thomas W. Mattman|arXiv (Cornell University)|Mar 27, 2013
Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation11 references3 citations
TL;DR

This paper proves that the 14 graphs obtained by $ abla\mathrm{Y}$ moves on $K_7$ are the only minor-minimal intrinsically knotted (MMIK) graphs with 21 edges. Using induction on decreasing graph order and leveraging the fact that $ abla\mathrm{Y}$ moves preserve intrinsic knotting, the authors show no other 21-edge graph can be MMIK, completing the classification of MMIK graphs by edge count.

ABSTRACT

We show that the 14 graphs obtained by $ abla\mathrm{Y}$ moves on K_7 constitute a complete list of the minor minimal intrinsically knotted graphs on 21 edges. We also present evidence in support of a conjecture that the 20 graph Heawood family, obtained by a combination of $ abla\mathrm{Y}$ and $\mathrm{Y} abla$ moves on K_7, is the list of graphs of size 21 that are minor minimal with respect to the property not 2--apex.

Motivation & Objective

  • To complete the classification of minor-minimal intrinsically knotted (MMIK) graphs by edge count, specifically for graphs of size 21.
  • To prove that the 14 graphs formed by $ abla\mathrm{Y}$ moves on $K_7$ (the KS graphs) are the only MMIK graphs with 21 edges.
  • To investigate whether the Heawood family—generated by $ abla\mathrm{Y}$ and $\mathrm{Y}\nabla$ moves on $K_7$—contains all minor-minimal non-2-apex (MMN2A) graphs of size 21.
  • To examine the preservation of the non-2-apex property under $\mathrm{Y}\nabla$ moves, particularly in the context of size-21 graphs.

Proposed method

  • Use induction on decreasing graph order, starting from 14-vertex graphs down to 11–13 vertices, to analyze possible MMIK graphs of size 21.
  • Leverage the fact that $ abla\mathrm{Y}$ moves preserve intrinsic knotting, a property attributed to Sachs, to maintain IK status through graph transformations.
  • Apply degree sequence analysis and vertex deletion arguments: for a graph $G$ of size 21, if $G - a, b$ is planar for any two vertices $a, b$, then $G$ is not N2A, contradicting the assumption of being MMIK or MMN2A.
  • Use known classifications of small non-planar graphs (e.g., (7,10), (7,11), (8,12), (8,13)) to eliminate candidate graphs via case analysis.
  • Apply the $YT$ move (a form of $ abla\mathrm{Y}$) to reduce graphs with degree-three vertices to smaller graphs, relying on Proposition 1.4 to preserve the N2A property.
  • Use symmetry and adjacency constraints in degree-4 and degree-5 graphs to eliminate configurations where $G - a, b$ would be planar, thus contradicting N2A or MMIK status.

Experimental results

Research questions

  • RQ1Are the 14 KS graphs the only minor-minimal intrinsically knotted graphs with 21 edges?
  • RQ2Is the Heawood family—the set of 20 graphs obtained from $K_7$ via $ abla\mathrm{Y}$ and $\mathrm{Y}\nabla$ moves—the complete list of minor-minimal non-2-apex (MMN2A) graphs of size 21?
  • RQ3Does the $\mathrm{Y}\nabla$ move preserve the non-2-apex property in graphs of size 21?
  • RQ4What is the smallest graph that is non-2-apex but becomes 2-apex after a $\mathrm{Y}\nabla$ move?

Key findings

  • The 14 graphs obtained by $ abla\mathrm{Y}$ moves on $K_7$ are the only minor-minimal intrinsically knotted (MMIK) graphs with 21 edges.
  • All connected 21-edge intrinsically knotted graphs are minor-minimal, as size-20 graphs are known to be non-IK.
  • For graphs of order 11, 12, or 13 with 21 edges, any non-2-apex graph must be part of the Heawood family.
  • Graphs of order 14 or more that are minor-minimal non-2-apex must be Heawood graphs, as they must have minimum degree 3 and satisfy the same structural constraints.
  • The degree sequence $\{4^8, 5^2\}$ with the two degree-5 vertices adjacent, and $G - a, b$ being a cubic graph on 8 vertices, leads to only one possibility: graph 20 of the Heawood family.
  • If a 10-vertex graph of size 21 is non-2-apex and has minimum degree greater than 3, it must be graph 20 of the Heawood family, confirming its uniqueness in this class.

Better researchstarts right now

From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.

No credit card · Free plan available

This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.