[Paper Review] Low frequency Raman response near Ising-nematic quantum critical point: a memory matrix approach
This paper develops a memory matrix approach to explain the low-frequency Raman response near an Ising-nematic quantum critical point, showing that the observed quasi-elastic peak arises from slow relaxation of Fermi surface nematic deformations. The peak frequency scales as $\Gamma(T) \propto \tau^{-1}\chi^{-1}$, where $\chi$ is the nematic susceptibility and $\tau^{-1}$ is the decay rate from critical fluctuations and impurities, with $\omega^{1/3}$ scaling at higher frequencies consistent with prior work.
Recent Raman scattering experiments have revealed a "quasi-elastic peak" in $\mathrm{FeSe_{1-x}S_x}$ near an Ising-nematic quantum critical point (QCP) \cite{zhang17}. Notably, the peak occurs at sub-temperature frequencies, and softens as $T^α$ when temperature is decreased toward the QCP, with $α>1$. In this work, we present a theoretical analysis of the low-frequency Raman response using a memory matrix approach. We show that such a quasi-elastic peak is associated with the relaxation of an Ising-nematic deformation of the Fermi surface. Specifically, we find that the peak frequency is proportional to $ τ^{-1}χ^{-1}$, where $χ$ is the Ising-nematic thermodynamic susceptibility, and $τ^{-1}$ is the decay rate of the nematic deformation due to an interplay between impurity scattering and electron-electron scattering mediated by critical Ising-nematic fluctuations. We argue that the critical fluctuations play a crucial role in determining the observed temperature dependence of the frequency of the quasi-elastic peak. At frequencies larger than the temperature, we find that the Raman response is proportional to $ω^{1/3}$, consistently with earlier predictions \cite{klein18a}.
Motivation & Objective
- To explain the experimentally observed quasi-elastic peak (QEP) in low-frequency Raman scattering of FeSe$_{1-x}$S$_x$ near an Ising-nematic quantum critical point (QCP).
- To understand the origin of the QEP's sub-temperature frequency and its softening as $T^\alpha$ with $\alpha > 1$ as temperature decreases toward the QCP.
- To reconcile the observed QEP with theoretical models by incorporating both impurity scattering and electron-electron scattering via critical nematic fluctuations.
- To derive the frequency dependence of the Raman response in the high-frequency regime, confirming $\omega^{1/3}$ scaling.
Proposed method
- The study employs a memory matrix approach to treat quasi-particle occupation numbers near the Fermi surface as slow variables, enabling a non-perturbative treatment of relaxation dynamics.
- The memory matrix $M_{\hat{Q},\hat{Q}}(\omega)$ is computed from the dynamical nematic susceptibility $D_{\text{nem}}(\mathbf{q}\rightarrow 0,\omega)$, incorporating both impurity scattering and critical nematic fluctuations.
- The approach accounts for Landau damping via electron-hole excitations near the Fermi surface and includes momentum diffusion effects in the high-frequency limit.
- The model uses a two-dimensional boson-fermion action with linear coupling between electrons and Ising-nematic order parameter fields, allowing for critical fluctuations near the QCP.
- The memory matrix is decomposed into contributions from nematic fluctuations ($M_{\text{nem}}$) and impurity scattering ($M_{\text{imp}}$), with $M(T) = M_{\text{nem}}(T) + M_{\text{imp}}(T)$.
- The dynamical response is derived from the imaginary part of the susceptibility, $\mathrm{Im}D_{\text{nem}}(\omega) \approx M_{\text{Q,Q}}(\omega)/\omega$, leading to $\omega^{1/3}$ scaling at $\omega \gg T$.
Experimental results
Research questions
- RQ1What causes the quasi-elastic peak (QEP) in low-frequency Raman scattering of FeSe$_{1-x}$S$_x$ near the Ising-nematic QCP?
- RQ2Why does the QEP frequency soften as $T^\alpha$ with $\alpha > 1$ as temperature decreases?
- RQ3How do critical nematic fluctuations and impurity scattering jointly influence the relaxation dynamics of the nematic deformation?
- RQ4What determines the frequency dependence of the Raman response at frequencies above the temperature scale?
- RQ5Can the memory matrix approach reconcile the observed $\omega^{1/3}$ scaling with the sub-temperature QEP?
Key findings
- The quasi-elastic peak frequency $\Gamma(T)$ is proportional to $\tau^{-1}\chi^{-1}$, where $\tau^{-1}$ is the decay rate of the nematic deformation and $\chi$ is the thermodynamic nematic susceptibility.
- At low temperatures, impurity scattering dominates, leading to $\Gamma(T) \propto T$, consistent with the $T$-linear scattering rate observed in experiments.
- At higher temperatures, nematic fluctuations dominate, resulting in a stronger temperature dependence of $\Gamma(T)$, with $\alpha > 1$ in the $T^\alpha$ softening.
- In the high-frequency regime ($\omega \gg T$), the Raman response scales as $\omega^{1/3}$, confirming earlier perturbative predictions at zero temperature.
- The model quantitatively reproduces the experimental data for FeSe$_{1-x}$S$_x$ when the impurity scattering strength is tuned, without fine-tuning other parameters.
- The QEP is attributed to the slow relaxation of an Ising-nematic deformation of the Fermi surface, analogous to the Drude peak in optical conductivity.
Better researchstarts right now
From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.
No credit card · Free plan available
This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.