[Paper Review] Moments and power corrections of longitudinal and transverse proton structure functions from lattice QCD
This paper presents the first lattice QCD calculation of the lowest moments of the proton's longitudinal (FL) and transverse (F2) structure functions, using the second-order Feynman-Hellmann theorem applied to the forward Compton amplitude. It quantifies Q²-dependent moments of F2 and finds significant power corrections, with results in good agreement with experimental data across a range of Q² values.
We present a simultaneous extraction of the moments of $F_2$ and $F_L$ structure functions of the proton at a range of photon virtuality, $Q^2$. This is achieved by computing the forward Compton amplitude via an application of the second-order Feynman-Hellmann method. We find the moments of $F_{2,L}$ in good agreement with experimental values. By studying the $Q^2$ dependence of $F_2$ moments, we estimate the power corrections.
Motivation & Objective
- To provide first-principles lattice QCD predictions for the low moments of the proton's longitudinal (FL) and transverse (F2) structure functions.
- To quantify the Q² dependence of the lowest moment of F2, which had not been previously computed in lattice QCD.
- To assess the role of power corrections in structure functions, particularly in the intermediate Q² regime where non-perturbative effects are significant.
- To circumvent operator mixing issues in higher-twist calculations by using the full Compton amplitude instead of matrix elements of local operators.
- To improve theoretical constraints for global PDF analyses by providing ab initio results on higher-twist contributions.
Proposed method
- Computing the forward Compton amplitude on the lattice using the second-order Feynman-Hellmann theorem to extract matrix elements of the electromagnetic current.
- Utilizing the Compton amplitude to reconstruct the structure functions F1, F2, and FL via dispersion relations and analyticity properties.
- Expressing the Compton amplitude as an expansion in Mellin moments of F1, F2, and FL, enabling direct extraction of moments from lattice data.
- Applying a polynomial fit in ω to the Compton amplitude ratios to isolate moments, with stability checks across fit orders.
- Using Bayesian inference to extract posterior distributions of moments, including credible intervals, from lattice data on two ensembles with different lattice spacings and volumes.
- Separating contributions from uu, dd, and ud quark pairs to study flavor dependence of moments.
Experimental results
Research questions
- RQ1Can lattice QCD accurately compute the lowest moments of the proton's longitudinal structure function FL, particularly at intermediate Q²?
- RQ2What is the Q² dependence of the lowest moment of F2, and how does it compare to experimental data?
- RQ3How significant are power corrections in the moments of F2 and FL, and can they be quantified from first principles in lattice QCD?
- RQ4Does the lattice QCD calculation of the full Compton amplitude avoid the operator mixing problems inherent in traditional OPE-based approaches?
- RQ5To what extent do lattice results on moments agree with experimental measurements and global PDF fits?
Key findings
- The lowest moment of F2, M²₂(Q²), is successfully quantified for the first time in lattice QCD, with results showing a clear Q² dependence.
- The moments of F2 and FL computed on the lattice are in good agreement with experimental data from HERA and Jefferson Lab across the range of Q² studied.
- Power corrections are found to be significant, particularly in the FL structure function, indicating non-negligible higher-twist contributions.
- The extracted moments of F1 and FL show consistent behavior across different lattice ensembles, with stable results across fit orders and credible intervals well-constrained.
- The uu, dd, and ud quark contributions to the moments exhibit similar trends, with the M(L)₀ moment directly proportional to the lowest F2 moment.
- Density plots of posterior distributions confirm the robustness of the extracted moments, with 68% highest posterior density regions clearly defined and consistent with experimental constraints.
Better researchstarts right now
From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.
No credit card · Free plan available
This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.