Skip to main content
QUICK REVIEW

[Paper Review] Multiplicity results for $(p,\, q)$ fractional elliptic equations involving critical nonlinearities

Mousomi Bhakta, Debangana Mukherjee|arXiv (Cornell University)|Jan 30, 2018
Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations21 citations
TL;DR

This paper establishes the existence of infinitely many nontrivial solutions for a class of $(p,q)$ fractional elliptic equations with concave-critical nonlinearities in bounded domains using variational methods. For convex-critical nonlinearities, it proves the existence of at least $\text{cat}_{\Omega}(\Omega)$ nonnegative solutions via a concentration-compactness approach and critical point theory.

ABSTRACT

In this paper we prove the existence of infinitely many nontrivial solutions for the class of $(p,\, q)$ fractional elliptic equations involving concave-critical nonlinearities in bounded domains in $\mathbb{R}^N$. Further, when the nonlinearity is of convex-critical type, we establish the multiplicity of nonnegative solutions using variational methods. In particular, we show the existence of at least $cat_Ω(Ω)$ nonnegative solutions.

Motivation & Objective

  • To establish the existence of infinitely many nontrivial solutions for $(p,q)$ fractional elliptic equations with concave-critical nonlinearities in bounded domains.
  • To prove the existence of multiple nonnegative solutions when the nonlinearity is of convex-critical type.
  • To extend variational methods to the nonlocal $(p,q)$ fractional Laplacian setting in bounded domains.
  • To apply concentration-compactness principles and critical point theory to overcome lack of compactness in fractional Sobolev embeddings.
  • To connect the multiplicity of solutions to the topological category $\text{cat}_{\Omega}(\Omega)$ of the domain $\Omega$.

Proposed method

  • Utilizes the fractional Sobolev space $X_{0,s_1,p}(\Omega)$ and the associated norm involving nonlocal Gagliardo seminorms.
  • Applies the concentration-compactness principle to handle lack of compactness in the embedding of $X_{0,s_1,p}(\Omega)$ into $L^{p^*_{s_1}}(\Omega)$.
  • Employs variational methods by analyzing the energy functional associated with the equation and proving the (PS) condition below a critical threshold.
  • Uses the Krasnoselskii genus and deformation lemma to establish the existence of multiple critical points.
  • Applies the mountain pass lemma and deformation arguments to locate critical points of the energy functional.
  • Relies on topological tools such as the category $\text{cat}_{\Omega}(\Omega)$ to estimate the number of solutions.

Experimental results

Research questions

  • RQ1Can we prove the existence of infinitely many nontrivial solutions for $(p,q)$ fractional elliptic equations with concave-critical nonlinearities in bounded domains?
  • RQ2What is the precise number of nonnegative solutions when the nonlinearity is of convex-critical type?
  • RQ3How does the topology of the domain $\Omega$ influence the number of solutions to the $(p,q)$ fractional elliptic problem?
  • RQ4Can the concentration-compactness method be adapted to the nonlocal $(p,q)$ fractional setting to recover compactness?
  • RQ5What is the role of the fractional Laplacian operators $(-\Delta)^{s_1}_p$ and $(-\Delta)^{s_2}_q$ in ensuring multiplicity of solutions?

Key findings

  • The equation $(P_{\theta,\lambda})$ admits infinitely many nontrivial solutions when the nonlinearity is of concave-critical type.
  • For convex-critical nonlinearities, the equation has at least $\text{cat}_{\Omega}(\Omega)$ nonnegative solutions.
  • The energy functional satisfies the (PS) condition below the critical level $\frac{s_1}{N}(S_{s_1,p})^{N/(s_1 p)}$, enabling application of critical point theory.
  • The existence of multiple solutions is linked to the topological category of the domain $\Omega$, with the number of solutions bounded below by $\text{cat}_{\Omega}(\Omega)$.
  • The concentration-compactness method successfully controls the lack of compactness in the fractional Sobolev embedding $X_{0,s_1,p}(\Omega) \hookrightarrow L^{p^*_{s_1}}(\Omega)$.
  • The proof relies on constructing a deformation retraction and using odd maps to relate the category of sublevel sets to the number of critical points.

Better researchstarts right now

From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.

No credit card · Free plan available

This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.