[Paper Review] On Popov's formula involving the Von Mangoldt function
This paper provides the first known proof of Popov's 1943 formula involving the von Mangoldt function and fractional parts, generalizing it to arbitrary real $ r \geq 1 $ using Mellin transforms and contour integration. The key contribution is a new explicit formula relating sums over $ \Lambda(n) $ to non-trivial zeros $ \rho $ of the Riemann zeta function and trivial zeros, with analogous results for the Möbius function.
We offer a generalization of a formula of Popov involving the Von Mangoldt function. Some commentary on its relation to other results in analytic number theory is mentioned as well as an analogue involving the m$\ddot{o}$bius function.
Motivation & Objective
- To provide a rigorous proof of Popov's unproven 1943 formula involving the von Mangoldt function and fractional parts.
- To generalize Popov's formula to arbitrary real $ r \geq 1 $, extending its applicability.
- To establish an analogous formula for the Möbius function $ \mu(n) $, linking it to zeta function zeros.
- To clarify the connection between arithmetic sums with fractional parts and the non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function.
- To demonstrate the utility of Mellin transform and contour integration techniques in analytic number theory for such sums.
Proposed method
- Use of the Mellin transform of $ \{t\} - \frac{1}{2} $, known to yield $ \frac{s+1}{2s(s-1)} - \frac{\zeta(s)}{s} $ for $ \Re(s) > 1 $.
- Application of Mellin inversion to express $ \frac{1}{2}(\{u\}^2 - \{u\}) $ as a contour integral involving $ \zeta(s) $ and $ s $.
- Substitution $ u = \frac{n}{x} $ and summation over $ n > x $, leading to an integral involving $ \zeta'(r-s)/\zeta(r-s) $.
- Change of variables $ s \to 1-s $ to re-express the integral in terms of $ \zeta(s+r-1) $, revealing poles at $ s=1 $, $ s=2-r $, $ s=\rho+1-r $, and $ s=-2k-r+1 $.
- Computation of residues at these poles to derive the main formula, with the remaining integral vanishing due to absolute convergence.
- Adaptation of the method to the Möbius function case, using the functional equation of $ \zeta(s) $ to evaluate residues at trivial zeros.
Experimental results
Research questions
- RQ1What is the correct generalization of Popov's formula for $ r \geq 1 $, and how can it be rigorously proven?
- RQ2How do the non-trivial zeros $ \rho $ of the Riemann zeta function emerge in sums involving the von Mangoldt function and fractional parts?
- RQ3Can the same method be adapted to derive a formula for the Möbius function $ \mu(n) $, and what role do the trivial zeros play?
- RQ4What is the significance of the constant term $ h_r(x) $, and how does it relate to the poles at $ s=1 $ and $ s=2-r $?
- RQ5How does the Mellin transform technique facilitate the derivation of such explicit formulas in analytic number theory?
Key findings
- The generalized formula (1.2) holds for all real $ r \geq 1 $, with the sum over $ \Lambda(n) $ expressed via residues at $ s=1 $, $ s=2-r $, $ s=\rho+1-r $, and $ s=-2k-r+1 $.
- For $ r=1 $, the formula reduces to Popov's original result, with the constant term $ h_1(x) = \frac{2 - \log(2\pi)}{2x} $.
- For $ r > 1 $, the constant term is $ h_r(x) = \left( \frac{r}{2(2-r)(1-r)} - \frac{\zeta(r-1)}{1-r} \right) \frac{x^{-r}}{r} $, arising from the pole at $ s=2-r $.
- The sum over non-trivial zeros $ \rho $ appears as $ \sum_{\rho} \left( \frac{r+1-\rho}{2(\rho+1-r)(\rho-r)} - \frac{\zeta(r-\rho)}{r-\rho} \right) \frac{x^{\rho-r-1}}{r+1-\rho} $.
- The sum over trivial zeros contributes terms involving $ \zeta(2k+r) $, with coefficients derived from the functional equation of $ \zeta(s) $.
- An analogous formula is derived for the Möbius function $ \mu(n) $, where the residue at $ s=1 $ vanishes and the trivial zero residues involve $ \frac{1}{\zeta'(-2k)} $, yielding a new explicit formula involving $ \pi^{2k} $, $ \zeta(2k+1) $, and factorials.
Better researchstarts right now
From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.
No credit card · Free plan available
This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.