[Paper Review] Single-Model Uncertainties for Deep Learning
The paper introduces two single-model uncertainty estimators for deep learning: Simultaneous Quantile Regression (SQR) for aleatoric uncertainty and Orthonormal Certificates (OCs) for epistemic uncertainty, achieving competitive results without ensembling or retraining.
We provide single-model estimates of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty for deep neural networks. To estimate aleatoric uncertainty, we propose Simultaneous Quantile Regression (SQR), a loss function to learn all the conditional quantiles of a given target variable. These quantiles can be used to compute well-calibrated prediction intervals. To estimate epistemic uncertainty, we propose Orthonormal Certificates (OCs), a collection of diverse non-constant functions that map all training samples to zero. These certificates map out-of-distribution examples to non-zero values, signaling epistemic uncertainty. Our uncertainty estimators are computationally attractive, as they do not require ensembling or retraining deep models, and achieve competitive performance.
Motivation & Objective
- Provide single-model estimates of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in deep neural networks.
- Develop a scalable method to obtain prediction intervals without model ensembling or retraining.
- Offer a unified discussion of related uncertainty estimation approaches to position the proposed methods.
Proposed method
- Simultaneous Quantile Regression (SQR) minimizes a randomized pinball loss to learn all conditional quantiles jointly, enabling non-Gaussian, skewed, and heteroskedastic aleatoric uncertainty.
- SQR yields prediction intervals from the estimated quantiles via u_a(x*) = f(x*,1−α/2) − f(x*,α/2).
- Orthonormal Certificates (OCs) construct a set of diverse, non-constant certificate functions C that map training representations φ(x) to zero, enabling detection of out-of-domain samples via u_e(x*) = ||C^T φ(x*)||^2.
- Certificates are trained with an orthonormality constraint to ensure diversity, implemented as minimizing a loss with a regularizer ||C^T C − I_k||.
- OC performance is analyzed through tail bounds showing separation between in-domain and out-domain distributions.
- The approach is compatible with any pre-trained network by stacking on the last-layer representation.
Experimental results
Research questions
- RQ1Can a single neural network model provide reliable, calibrated prediction intervals for aleatoric uncertainty without ensembling?
- RQ2Can a single-model approach detect epistemic uncertainty and out-of-distribution samples effectively without retraining or extensive hyperparameter tuning?
- RQ3How do SQR and OC methods compare to existing uncertainty estimation approaches in practice on standard benchmarks?
- RQ4What theoretical guarantees or insights support the behavior of orthonormal certificates in distinguishing in-domain and out-of-domain data?
Key findings
- SQR delivers well-calibrated 1−α prediction intervals and can model complex, non-Gaussian aleatoric uncertainty without model ensembling.
- OCs provide competitive out-of-distribution detection performance using a single model, often outperforming several baselines across multiple datasets.
- SQR can be added as an extra output layer to any neural network without compromising performance or requiring retraining.
- OC theoretical analysis includes tail bounds that describe the behavior of epistemic uncertainty for in-domain versus out-of-domain data.
- The proposed methods achieve competitive results while reducing computation and storage relative to ensembles.
Better researchstarts right now
From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.
No credit card · Free plan available
This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.