Skip to main content
QUICK REVIEW

[Paper Review] Size - Stellar Mass Relation and Morphology of Quiescent Galaxies at $z\geq3$ in Public $JWST$ Fields

Kei Ito, Francesco Valentino|arXiv (Cornell University)|Jul 13, 2023
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena5 citations
TL;DR

This study analyzes the size-mass relation and morphology of 26 quiescent galaxies at z≥3 using JWST/NIRCam imaging, finding a negative size-wavelength correlation and a rest-frame 0.5 μm size-mass relation that lies below local relations by ~0.6 kpc at M⋆=5×10¹⁰ M☉. The results imply monotonic size growth from z≈3–5, with evolving morphology suggesting a transition toward bulge-dominated structures by z>3.

ABSTRACT

We present the results of a systematic study of the rest-frame optical morphology of quiescent galaxies at $z \geq 3$ using the Near-Infrared Camera (NIRCam) onboard $JWST$. Based on a sample selected by $UVJ$ color or $NUVUVJ$ color, we focus on 26 quiescent galaxies with $9.8<\log{(M_\star/M_\odot)}<11.4$ at $2.810.3$ implies that our size - stellar mass relations are below those at lower redshifts, with the amplitude of $\sim0.6\, { m kpc}$ at $M_\star = 5 imes 10^{10}\, M_\odot$. This value agrees with the extrapolation from the size evolution of quiescent galaxies at $z<3$ in the literature, implying that the size of quiescent galaxies increases monotonically from $z\sim3-5$. Our sample is mainly composed of galaxies with bulge-like structures according to their median Sérsic index and axis ratio of $n\sim3-4$ and $q\sim0.6-0.8$, respectively. On the other hand, there is a trend of increasing fraction of galaxies with low Sérsic index, suggesting $3

Motivation & Objective

  • To investigate the rest-frame optical morphology of quiescent galaxies at z≥3 using JWST/NIRCam data.
  • To measure the size-mass relation of high-redshift quiescent galaxies and compare it with lower-redshift relations.
  • To assess the structural evolution of quiescent galaxies from z≈3 to z≈5 through Sérsic profile fitting.
  • To determine whether morphological transformation, including the emergence of disky components, occurs during this epoch.

Proposed method

  • Selected 26 quiescent galaxies via UVJ or NUVUVJ color selection from public JWST fields with 2.8<zphot<4.6 and 9.8<log(M⋆/M☉)<11.4.
  • Fitted Sérsic profiles to multi-band NIRCam images using Galfit to measure effective radius, Sérsic index, and axis ratio.
  • Calibrated sizes to rest-frame 0.5 μm by extrapolating from observed-band measurements, correcting for wavelength-dependent size bias.
  • Assessed fitting quality using flags and bootstrapped uncertainties; validated with mock galaxy simulations for small sizes (re<0.02 arcsec).
  • Compared the derived size-mass relation with lower-redshift relations (e.g., z<3) to infer size evolution trends.
  • Analyzed morphological trends via Sérsic index and axis ratio distributions, especially across redshift bins.
Figure 1: Color images of all quiescent galaxies used in this study. F277W, F356W, and F444W images are used for blue, green, and red, respectively. All images are $4.0\arcsec\times 4.0\arcsec$ centered on each quiescent galaxy. They are sorted according to their photometric redshift. At the bottom
Figure 1: Color images of all quiescent galaxies used in this study. F277W, F356W, and F444W images are used for blue, green, and red, respectively. All images are $4.0\arcsec\times 4.0\arcsec$ centered on each quiescent galaxy. They are sorted according to their photometric redshift. At the bottom

Experimental results

Research questions

  • RQ1How does the rest-frame 0.5 μm size-mass relation of quiescent galaxies at z≥3 compare to those at lower redshifts?
  • RQ2What is the structural morphology (Sérsic index, axis ratio) of high-redshift quiescent galaxies, and how does it evolve with redshift?
  • RQ3Is there evidence for a morphological transformation epoch between z≈3 and z≈5, particularly the emergence of disky components?
  • RQ4To what extent do size measurements in different bands correlate, and how does this affect rest-frame size calibration?
  • RQ5How robust are size measurements for compact, low-S/N galaxies near the PSF resolution limit?

Key findings

  • The size-mass relation for quiescent galaxies at z≥3 lies ~0.6 kpc below the local relation at M⋆=5×10¹⁰ M☉, consistent with size evolution from z≈3–5.
  • Galaxies at z≥3 show a significant correlation between rest-frame 0.5 μm size and stellar mass, with median Sérsic indices of n≈3–4 and axis ratios of q≈0.6–0.8, indicating bulge-like morphology.
  • A trend of increasing fraction of low-Sérsic-index (n<3) galaxies at higher redshift (3<z<5) suggests a morphological transition phase with notable disky quenched components.
  • Size measurements in multiple bands show a negative correlation with observed wavelength, necessitating multi-band fitting to derive rest-frame sizes.
  • The size-mass relation at z≥3 is consistent with extrapolation of size evolution from z<3, implying continuous size growth from z≈5 to present.
  • Robustness tests confirm that size and structural parameter measurements remain reliable even for compact galaxies near the PSF resolution limit (re≈0.02 arcsec).
Figure 2: Left panel: $UVJ$ diagram (Williams et al., 2009 ) . Squares represent quiescent galaxies selected by the $UVJ$ only, whereas circles represent those selected by $UVJ$ and $NUVUVJ$ . They are colored according to their photometric redshift, and the markers are larger for more massive galax
Figure 2: Left panel: $UVJ$ diagram (Williams et al., 2009 ) . Squares represent quiescent galaxies selected by the $UVJ$ only, whereas circles represent those selected by $UVJ$ and $NUVUVJ$ . They are colored according to their photometric redshift, and the markers are larger for more massive galax

Better researchstarts right now

From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.

No credit card · Free plan available

This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.