[Paper Review] Tame automorphisms with multidegrees in the form of arithmetic progressions
This paper classifies which arithmetic progression multidegrees $(a, a+d, a+2d)$ can arise from tame automorphisms of $\mathbb{C}^3$. It proves that such multidegrees are realizable if and only if $a \mid 2d$, except for a single exceptional family $(4i, 4i+ij, 4i+2ij)$ with odd $j$, whose realizability depends on a conjecture about Poisson bracket degrees.
Let $(a,a+d,a+2d)$ be an arithmetic progression of positive integers. The following statements are proved: (1) If $a\mid 2d$, then $(a, a+d, a+2d)\in\mdeg(\Tame(\mathbb{C}^3))$. (2) If $a mid 2d$, then, except for arithmetic progressions of the form $(4i,4i+ij,4i+2ij)$ with $i,j \in\mathbb{N}$ and $j$ is an odd number, $(a, a+d, a+2d) otin\mdeg(\Tame(\mathbb{C}^3))$. We also related the exceptional unknown case to a conjecture of Jie-tai Yu, which concerns with the lower bound of the degree of the Poisson bracket of two polynomials.
Motivation & Objective
- To determine which arithmetic progression multidegrees $(a, a+d, a+2d)$ can be realized by tame automorphisms of $\mathbb{C}^3$.
- To resolve the realizability of multidegrees in the exceptional case $(4i, 4i+ij, 4i+2ij)$ with odd $j$, which remains open.
- To connect the realizability of these multidegrees to a conjecture on the lower bound of Poisson bracket degrees.
- To extend previous results on multidegrees of tame automorphisms in dimension three, particularly for symmetric and consecutive integer sequences.
Proposed method
- Use of the $*$-reduced pair inequality from Shestakov and Umirbaev's work on the Nagata automorphism to bound the degree of polynomial compositions.
- Application of Theorem 2.1 to derive lower bounds on $\deg g(F_1, F_2)$ when $F$ admits a reduction, based on the Poisson bracket $[F_1, F_2]$.
- Analysis of elementary reductions via permutation of variables and degree comparison, showing contradictions when $a \nmid 2d$ and in the exceptional case.
- Reduction to the study of $\deg[F_i, F_j]$ for pairs of polynomials, particularly $[F_1, F_3]$ in the exceptional case.
- Use of the conjecture by Jie-tai Yu on the lower bound of $\deg[f,g]$ for algebraically independent polynomials with dependent leading forms.
- Systematic case analysis of all three types of elementary reductions: on $F_1$, $F_2$, and $F_3$, showing none are possible in the exceptional case unless the conjecture holds.
Experimental results
Research questions
- RQ1For which positive integers $a$ and $d$ is the multidegree $(a, a+d, a+2d)$ in $\mathrm{mdeg}(\mathrm{Tame}(\mathbb{C}^3))$?
- RQ2What is the role of the condition $a \mid 2d$ in determining the realizability of such multidegrees?
- RQ3Why is the family $(4i, 4i+ij, 4i+2ij)$ with odd $j$ the only exceptional case not covered by the $a \mid 2d$ criterion?
- RQ4How does the conjecture of Jie-tai Yu on Poisson bracket degrees relate to the realizability of these multidegrees?
- RQ5Can the multidegree $(8,10,12)$ be realized by a tame automorphism of $\mathbb{C}^3$?
Key findings
- If $a \mid 2d$, then the multidegree $(a, a+d, a+2d)$ is in $\mathrm{mdeg}(\mathrm{Tame}(\mathbb{C}^3))$.
- If $a \nmid 2d$, then $(a, a+d, a+2d) \notin \mathrm{mdeg}(\mathrm{Tame}(\mathbb{C}^3))$ except possibly for the family $(4i, 4i+ij, 4i+2ij)$ with $i,j \in \mathbb{N}$ and $j$ odd.
- The exceptional case $(4i, 4i+ij, 4i+2ij)$ with odd $j$ cannot be realized unless the conjecture of Jie-tai Yu on Poisson bracket degrees holds.
- The multidegree $(4,5,6)$ is not realizable, as previously shown by Karaś, and this is consistent with the $a \nmid 2d$ condition.
- The only unresolved case is $(8,10,12)$, which corresponds to $i=2$, $j=1$ in the exceptional family.
- For continuous odd integers, only $(1,3,5)$ is realizable among such sequences, as $d_1=1$ is the only case satisfying $a \mid 2d$.
Better researchstarts right now
From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.
No credit card · Free plan available
This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.