[Paper Review] The (g-2)_mu data and the lightest Higgs boson in 2HDM(II)
This paper uses the new E821 measurement of the muon's anomalous magnetic moment to constrain the lightest Higgs boson in the non-supersymmetric 2HDM(II) model. By applying a two-loop calculation of Higgs contributions to $a_\mu$, it derives tighter limits on the Yukawa couplings of the light scalar $h$ and pseudoscalar $A$, showing that a pseudoscalar with mass between 25–70 GeV and $\tan\beta > 30$ is allowed, while a light scalar is excluded.
The present limits on the lightest Higgs boson in 2HDM (II) in light of the new E821 measurement of g-2 for the muon are discussed.
Motivation & Objective
- To re-evaluate constraints on the lightest Higgs boson in 2HDM(II) using the updated E821 measurement of the muon's anomalous magnetic moment.
- To assess the impact of uncertainties in the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution on the allowed new physics contribution to $a_\mu$.
- To apply a two-loop calculation of Higgs contributions to $a_\mu$ to derive improved constraints on the Yukawa couplings of the light scalar $h$ and pseudoscalar $A$.
- To combine the $g-2_\mu$ constraints with existing experimental limits from $Z \to h(A)\gamma$, $\Upsilon$ decays, and LEP searches to derive current bounds on the light Higgs sector.
- To determine whether a light Higgs boson in 2HDM(II) can simultaneously satisfy the $g-2_\mu$ anomaly and other experimental constraints.
Proposed method
- The study uses two representative Standard Model predictions for $a_\mu^{SM}$: one based on Davier and Höcker (DH) for the hadronic contribution (case A), and another from Jegerlehner (J2000) with a larger uncertainty (case B).
- The difference $\Delta a_\mu = a_\mu^{exp} - a_\mu^{SM}$ is calculated with combined experimental and theoretical uncertainties, and 95% confidence level (CL) intervals for the new physics contribution $\delta a_\mu$ are derived.
- A two-loop calculation of the Higgs contributions to $a_\mu$ is performed, including fermionic and bosonic loop diagrams involving $W^+$ and $H^\pm$ for scalar $h$, and $H^\pm$ for pseudoscalar $A$, with $\chi_V^h = 0$ to suppress $W$-loop contributions.
- The analysis assumes a single dominant Higgs exchange (either $h$ or $A$) and evaluates the resulting $\delta a_\mu$ as a function of Higgs mass and $\tan\beta$.
- Constraints from ALEPH, DELPHI, OPAL, and LEP on the Yukawa coupling are combined with the $g-2_\mu$ bounds, and limits from $Z \to h(A)\gamma$, $\Upsilon$ decays, and Tevatron searches are incorporated.
- The results are compared across case A (smaller hadronic uncertainty) and case B (larger uncertainty), with case A yielding a positive $\delta a_\mu$ band and case B allowing both positive and negative contributions.
Experimental results
Research questions
- RQ1Can the new E821 measurement of $g-2_\mu$ be reconciled with the 2HDM(II) model through contributions from a light Higgs boson?
- RQ2How do uncertainties in the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution affect the allowed region for new physics in $a_\mu$?
- RQ3What are the constraints on the Yukawa couplings of the lightest Higgs boson ($h$ or $A$) in 2HDM(II) when a two-loop calculation is used instead of a one-loop approximation?
- RQ4Which mass ranges and $\tan\beta$ values for the light Higgs bosons are consistent with both the $g-2_\mu$ anomaly and other experimental limits?
- RQ5Does the combination of $g-2_\mu$ data with other low-energy and LEP constraints allow for a light scalar $h$ or a light pseudoscalar $A$ in 2HDM(II)?
Key findings
- For case A (based on the DH hadronic contribution), the 95% CL interval for $\delta a_\mu$ is $102 \leq \delta a_\mu \leq 750 \times 10^{-11}$, indicating a positive contribution only.
- For case B (based on J2000), the 95% CL interval is $-8.65 \leq \delta a_\mu \leq 733 \times 10^{-11}$, allowing both positive and negative contributions.
- The two-loop analysis shows that a positive $\delta a_\mu$ can arise from a scalar $h$ with mass below 5 GeV or a pseudoscalar $A$ with mass above 3 GeV.
- A negative $\delta a_\mu$ is associated with a scalar $h$ above 5 GeV or a pseudoscalar $A$ below 3 GeV.
- Combining the $g-2_\mu$ constraints with other limits, a pseudoscalar $A$ with mass between 25 GeV and 70 GeV and $\tan\beta > 30$ is allowed, while a light scalar $h$ is excluded.
- The results improve upon previous limits, particularly for $A$ above 50 GeV and $h$ above 10 GeV, when using case B, and provide allowed regions for $h$ below 5 GeV and $A$ above 3 GeV in case A.
Better researchstarts right now
From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.
No credit card · Free plan available
This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.