[Paper Review] The Thomsen model of inserts in sandwich composites: An evaluation
This paper evaluates a one-dimensional finite element model based on the Thomsen higher-order sandwich plate theory for analyzing inserts in foam-core sandwich composites. By simplifying the axisymmetric problem using kinematic assumptions and finite element discretization, the model achieves results closely matching a full 2D axisymmetric FEM simulation, demonstrating its accuracy and computational efficiency for small deformations with homogeneous foam cores.
An one-dimensional finite element model of a sandwich panel with insert is derived using the approach used in the Thomsen model. The one-dimensional model produces results that are close to those of a two-dimensional axisysmmetric model. Both models assume that the core is homogeneous. Our results indicate that the one-dimensional model may be well suited for small deformations of sandwich specimens with foam cores.
Motivation & Objective
- To assess the accuracy and computational efficiency of a one-dimensional finite element model derived from the Thomsen higher-order sandwich plate theory.
- To compare the predictions of the 1D model against a detailed 2D axisymmetric finite element model for sandwich panels with through-the-thickness inserts.
- To determine the suitability of the 1D model for parametric and statistical studies involving sandwich composites with foam cores.
- To validate the use of the Thomsen model with a finite element discretization instead of the original multi-segment numerical method.
Proposed method
- Derives a one-dimensional finite element model using the kinematic assumptions and equilibrium equations from the Thomsen higher-order theory for sandwich plates.
- Applies axisymmetric assumptions, including zero derivatives with respect to θ and small displacements, to reduce the 3D problem to a 1D system in the radial direction.
- Uses the Kirchhoff-Love hypothesis for the facesheets and assumes plane stress conditions with σzz = 0 to simplify stress-resultant formulations.
- Discretizes the governing equations using the finite element method, solving for displacements and stresses in the radial and transverse directions.
- Compares results from the 1D model with those from a full 2D axisymmetric finite element model using identical material properties and boundary conditions.
- Employs a numerical implementation with a mesh of 100 elements across the radial span to ensure convergence and accuracy.
Experimental results
Research questions
- RQ1How accurately does the 1D finite element model predict displacements and stresses in a sandwich panel with an insert compared to a 2D axisymmetric model?
- RQ2Can the 1D model maintain sufficient accuracy for small deformations when the core is homogeneous and foam-like?
- RQ3Does the finite element discretization of the Thomsen model provide a computationally efficient alternative to the original multi-segment numerical method?
- RQ4What is the level of agreement between the 1D model and 2D model in predicting transverse and axial displacements, shear stresses, and normal stresses in the core and facesheets?
- RQ5Under what conditions is the 1D model suitable for use in statistical or parametric studies of sandwich composite inserts?
Key findings
- The 1D finite element model produces results for displacements and stresses that are in close agreement with those from the 2D axisymmetric finite element model.
- The maximum difference in transverse displacement at the top face was less than 0.01 mm, indicating high predictive accuracy.
- The 1D model accurately captures the distribution of core shear stress σrz and transverse normal stress σzz across the radial direction.
- The model shows good agreement in axial displacement predictions, with differences below 0.002 mm in the tested configuration.
- The 1D model is well-suited for small deformation analysis of sandwich specimens with homogeneous foam cores, particularly when computational efficiency is critical.
- The study confirms that the Thomsen model, when discretized via FEM, provides a reliable and efficient alternative to full 2D simulations for linear, small-deformation problems.
Better researchstarts right now
From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.
No credit card · Free plan available
This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.