[Paper Review] Weighted Orthogonal Polynomials-Based Generalization of Wirtinger-Type Integral Inequalities for Delayed Continuous-Time Systems
This paper introduces a novel class of weighted orthogonal polynomials-based integral inequalities that generalize and improve upon existing Wirtinger-type and Jensen's inequalities for stability analysis of delayed continuous-time systems. By leveraging orthogonal polynomials with respect to a weighted inner product, the proposed inequalities provide tighter lower bounds for integral terms in Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional derivatives, leading to less conservative stability criteria, with special cases recovering or refining prior results from the literature.
In the past three years, many researchers have proven and/or employed some Wirtinger-type integral inequalities to establish less conservative stability criteria for delayed continu\-ous-time systems. In this present paper, we will investigate weighted orthogonal polynomials-based integral inequalities which is a generalization of the existing Jensen's inequalities and Wirtinger-type integral inequalities.
Motivation & Objective
- To develop tighter integral inequalities for bounding Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional derivatives in delayed continuous-time systems.
- To reduce the conservatism inherent in existing stability criteria derived via Jensen’s inequality or Wirtinger-type inequalities.
- To unify and generalize existing integral inequalities, including Jensen’s and Wirtinger-type inequalities, as special cases of a broader framework.
- To provide a systematic method based on weighted orthogonal polynomials for deriving improved lower bounds on integral terms involving time-delayed states and their derivatives.
Proposed method
- Derives a general integral inequality using weighted orthogonal polynomials (WOPs) defined on the interval $[a,b]$ with weight function $(s-a)^m$.
- Constructs an orthogonal basis $\{p_{km}(s)\}$ in the space of polynomials of degree $\leq \mathcal{N}$ with respect to the inner product $(p,q)_m = \int_a^b (s-a)^m p(s)q(s) \, ds$.
- Applies the orthogonality property to derive a lower bound for the integral $\mathcal{I}_m(w_t) = \int_a^b \cdots \int_{\theta_m}^b w_t^T(s) R w_t(s) \, ds \cdots d\theta_1$.
- Establishes the inequality $\mathcal{I}_m(w_t) \geq \frac{(m+1)!}{(b-a)^{m+1}} \left( \Theta_m^T R \Theta_m + \text{higher-order terms} \right)$, where $\Theta_m$ involves weighted averages of $w_t(b)$ and integrals of $w_t(s)$.
- Demonstrates that the inequality reduces to known results (e.g., Jensen’s, Wirtinger-type) when $\mathcal{N} = 0$ or $\mathcal{N} = 1$, and improves upon them for $\mathcal{N} \geq 2$.
- Uses the framework to derive specific corollaries for $\mathcal{N} = 0,1$ and compares the resulting bounds with those in [11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 23, 29, 30], showing improved tightness.
Experimental results
Research questions
- RQ1Can weighted orthogonal polynomials be used to construct a general class of integral inequalities that subsumes and improves upon existing Wirtinger-type and Jensen’s inequalities?
- RQ2How does the choice of polynomial degree $\mathcal{N}$ affect the tightness of the lower bound for $\mathcal{I}_m(w_t)$?
- RQ3To what extent do the new inequalities reduce conservatism in stability criteria for delayed continuous-time systems compared to existing methods?
- RQ4Are the proposed inequalities equivalent to or strictly less conservative than known results such as those in [14, 15, 16, 29, 30]?
Key findings
- The proposed WOPs-based inequality generalizes Jensen’s inequality (when $\mathcal{N} = 0$) and Wirtinger-type inequalities (when $\mathcal{N} = 1$) as special cases.
- For $\mathcal{N} = 1$, the inequality provides a tighter lower bound than [8, Lemma 5 and 6], with a larger coefficient $\frac{m!(m+1)^2(m+3)}{(b-a)^{m+1}}$ compared to $\frac{m!(m+3)}{(b-a)^{m+1}}$.
- When $\mathcal{N} = 1$ and $m=1$, the inequality matches [15, (25)] and is shown to be less conservative than [11, Lemma 2.4] and [12, (13)].
- The inequality derived for $\mathcal{N} = 1$ and $m=1$ is equivalent to [29, Lemma 4] and [30, Lemma 1], but without requiring free-weighting matrices.
- The bound for $\mathcal{I}_1(\dot{w}_t)$ in Corollary 13 is tighter than [14, Corollary 1], as the coefficient of the second term is larger.
- The framework is extendable by replacing $(s-a)^k$ with $(b-s)^k$, yielding new inequalities that generalize [18, Corollary 4], [23, (3.1) and (3.8)], and [15, (18) and (26)].
Better researchstarts right now
From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.
No credit card · Free plan available
This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.