Kyushu University · Business, Management and Accounting
Professor Mark Fenwick's research lab focuses on the intersection of digital platforms, corporate governance, and regulatory innovation in the context of rapid technological change. The lab explores how platform economies reshape traditional business models and governance structures, with a particular emphasis on the role of digital technologies in transforming industries such as finance, healthcare, and public policy. It also investigates the societal and political implications of digital disruption, including the dynamics of public trust, misinformation, and criminal justice reform in the digital age. The lab’s work is deeply interdisciplinary, combining law, political science, and technology studies to address pressing challenges in governance and regulation.
Figures are computed from collected data and may differ slightly.
In a technology-driven, digital world, many of the largest and most successful businesses now operate as ‘platforms’. Such firms leverage networked technologies to facilitate economic exchange, transfer information, connect people, and make predictions. Platform companies are already disrupting multiple industries, including retail, hotels, taxis, and others, and are aggressively moving into new sectors, such as financial services. This paper examines the distinctive features of this new busines
Abstract Coronavirus is the first global crisis of a digital age and the divergence in policy responses reflects the challenge of navigating an unprecedented global situation under conditions of enormous uncertainty. We ask what lessons can be learned from this experience and identify two, both of which push against mainstream interpretations of recent events. First, and contrary to the view that the crisis exposed social media and Big Tech as a source of dangerous misinformation that needs to b
This article examines whether the concept of penal populism can be useful in understanding contemporary developments in Japanese criminal justice. In addressing this issue it is suggested that we need to draw a clear distinction between different conceptions of penal populism and, in particular, we should avoid equating penal populism with intensification of the severity of state punishment. A discussion of the Japanese experience highlights the importance of focusing on populism as a process by
Open papers in the app to read, cite, and organize with AI.