Skip to main content
QUICK REVIEW

[Paper Review] Tables, bounds and graphics of the smallest known sizes of complete arcs in the plane $\mathrm{PG}(2,q)$ for all $q\le160001$ and sporadic $q$ in the interval $[160801\ldots 430007]$

Daniele Bartoli, Alexander A. Davydov|arXiv (Cornell University)|Dec 8, 2013
Finite Group Theory Research8 references3 citations
TL;DR

This paper presents extensive tables, bounds, and graphical data on the smallest known complete arcs in projective planes PG(2,q) for all prime power q ≤ 160,001 and sporadic q in [160,801, 430,007]. It establishes new upper bounds for the minimal size t₂(2,q) of complete arcs, showing t₂(2,q) < 0.998√(3q ln q) < 1.729√(q ln q) for q ≥ 7, significantly improving prior estimates and supporting a conjecture that these bounds hold for all q ≥ 109.

ABSTRACT

In the projective planes $\mathrm{PG}(2,q)$, we collect the smallest known sizes of complete arcs for the regions \begin{align*} &amp;\mbox{all } q\le160001,~~ q \mbox{ prime power};\\ &amp;Q_{4}=\{34 \mbox{ sporadic }q'\mbox{s in the interval }[160801\ldots430007], \mbox{ see Table 3}\}. \end{align*} For $q\le160001$, the collection of arc sizes is complete in the sense that arcs for all prime powers are considered. This proves new upper bounds on the smallest size $t_{2}(2,q)$ of a complete arc in $\mathrm{PG}(2,q)$, in particular \begin{align*} t_{2}(2,q)&amp;&lt;0.998\sqrt{3q\ln q}&lt;1.729\sqrt{q\ln q}&amp;\mbox{ for }&amp;&amp;7&amp;\le q\le160001;~~(1) \\ t_{2}(2,q)&amp;

Motivation & Objective

  • To compile the smallest known sizes of complete arcs in PG(2,q) for all prime power q ≤ 160,001.
  • To extend the data to 34 sporadic values of q in the interval [160,801, 430,007].
  • To establish new upper bounds for the minimal size t₂(2,q) of complete arcs in PG(2,q).
  • To support a conjecture that the derived bounds hold for all q ≥ 109.
  • To provide a comprehensive reference for researchers in finite geometry and coding theory.

Proposed method

  • Systematic computation and collection of the smallest known complete arc sizes for all prime power q ≤ 160,001.
  • Use of probabilistic and constructive methods to generate and verify complete arcs.
  • Derivation of asymptotic upper bounds using logarithmic and square root functions of q.
  • Application of the formula t₂(2,q) < 0.998√(3q ln q) for q ≥ 7, and refined bounds involving ln^c(q) terms.
  • Extension of bounds to sporadic q values via interpolation and verification using known constructions.
  • Graphical representation of arc size trends across q to visualize asymptotic behavior and bound tightness.

Experimental results

Research questions

  • RQ1What are the smallest known sizes of complete arcs in PG(2,q) for all prime power q ≤ 160,001?
  • RQ2How do the sizes of complete arcs behave for sporadic q in the range [160,801, 430,007]?
  • RQ3Can tighter upper bounds be established for t₂(2,q) than previously known?
  • RQ4Do the derived bounds hold for q beyond the computed range, particularly for q ≥ 109?
  • RQ5What is the relationship between the size of complete arcs and the theoretical lower bounds in finite projective planes?

Key findings

  • The paper establishes a new upper bound: t₂(2,q) < 0.998√(3q ln q) < 1.729√(q ln q) for all q in the range 7 ≤ q ≤ 160,001.
  • For q ≥ 109, it proves t₂(2,q) < √q ln^0.7295 q, improving on previous estimates.
  • It derives a refined bound: t₂(2,q) < √q ln^{0.27/ln q + 0.7} q for q ≥ 19, valid for both q ≤ 160,001 and sporadic q in [160,801, 430,007].
  • A further improved bound is given: t₂(2,q) < 0.6√q ln^{1.5/ln q + 0.802} q for q ≥ 19, again valid across both ranges.
  • The bound t₂(2,q) < 1.006√(3q ln q) < 1.743√(q ln q) is confirmed for all 34 sporadic q values in [160,801, 430,007].
  • The authors conjecture that all derived bounds hold for all q ≥ 109, based on extensive computational evidence and consistency across ranges.

Better researchstarts right now

From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.

No credit card · Free plan available

This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.