Skip to main content
QUICK REVIEW

[论文解读] Reliability of PET/CT shape and heterogeneity features in functional and morphological components of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer tumors: a repeatability analysis in a prospective multi-center cohort

Marie-Charlotte Desseroit, Florent Tixier|arXiv (Cornell University)|Oct 5, 2016
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging参考文献 22被引用 6
一句话总结

本研究评估了在多个中心进行的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者PET和低剂量CT图像中形状与异质性特征的可重复性。基于74名患者的重复扫描PET/CT数据,研究发现特征可靠性因指标和量化方法而异,其中量化B方法可提高PET的可靠性,而量化W方法可增强CT的可靠性,凸显了在放射组学模型开发中需重点关注的关键因素。

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The main purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of shape and heterogeneity features in both Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and low-dose Computed Tomography (CT) components of PET/CT. A secondary objective was to investigate the impact of image quantization.Material and methods: A Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act -compliant secondary analysis of deidentified prospectively acquired PET/CT test-retest datasets of 74 patients from multi-center Merck and ACRIN trials was performed. Metabolically active volumes were automatically delineated on PET with Fuzzy Locally Adaptive Bayesian algorithm. 3DSlicerTM was used to semi-automatically delineate the anatomical volumes on low-dose CT components. Two quantization methods were considered: a quantization into a set number of bins (quantizationB) and an alternative quantization with bins of fixed width (quantizationW). Four shape descriptors, ten first-order metrics and 26 textural features were computed. Bland-Altman analysis was used to quantify repeatability. Features were subsequently categorized as very reliable, reliable, moderately reliable and poorly reliable with respect to the corresponding volume variability. Results: Repeatability was highly variable amongst features. Numerous metrics were identified as poorly or moderately reliable. Others were (very) reliable in both modalities, and in all categories (shape, 1st-, 2nd- and 3rd-order metrics). Image quantization played a major role in the features repeatability. Features were more reliable in PET with quantizationB, whereas quantizationW showed better results in CT.Conclusion: The test-retest repeatability of shape and heterogeneity features in PET and low-dose CT varied greatly amongst metrics. The level of repeatability also depended strongly on the quantization step, with different optimal choices for each modality. The repeatability of PET and low-dose CT features should be carefully taken into account when selecting metrics to build multiparametric models.

研究动机与目标

  • 评估多中心NSCLC肿瘤的PET和低剂量CT影像中放射组学特征的测试-重测可重复性。
  • 确定图像量化方法对功能型(PET)和解剖型(CT)影像组件中特征可靠性的影响。
  • 基于可重复性度量,将形状和异质性特征分类为极可靠、可靠、中等可靠或不可靠。
  • 通过识别模态和量化方法特定的最优特征,指导NSCLC多参数建模中稳健放射组学特征的选择。

提出的方法

  • 对74名NSCLC患者在多中心临床试验(默克和ACRIN)中获取的去标识化重复扫描PET/CT数据集进行符合HIPAA要求的二次分析。
  • 使用模糊局部自适应贝叶斯(FLAB)算法自动勾画PET图像中代谢活跃的肿瘤体积。
  • 使用3DSlicer™半自动勾画低剂量CT图像中的解剖肿瘤体积。
  • 应用两种量化方法:固定分箱数量(量化B)和固定分箱宽度(量化W)以计算特征。
  • 在两种模态中分别计算4种形状描述符、10种一阶指标和26种纹理特征。
  • 采用Bland-Altman分析量化测试-重测可重复性,并按可靠性水平对特征进行分类。

实验结果

研究问题

  • RQ1在NSCLC肿瘤的重复扫描中,从PET和低剂量CT提取的形状与异质性特征的可靠性如何?
  • RQ2图像量化方法的选择(固定分箱数量 vs. 固定分箱宽度)如何影响放射组学特征的可重复性?
  • RQ3哪些放射组学特征在PET与低剂量CT中表现出高可重复性,且在不同特征类别中表现如何?
  • RQ4影像模态(功能型PET vs. 解剖型CT)在多大程度上影响放射组学特征的可靠性?

主要发现

  • 放射组学特征的可重复性差异显著,许多特征在PET和CT中均被归类为不可靠或中等可靠。
  • 一小部分特征——尤其是形状、一阶和纹理类特征——在PET和CT模态中均表现出(极高)可靠性。
  • 量化B显著提高了PET图像中特征的可靠性,而量化W在低剂量CT图像中表现更优。
  • 量化方法的选择对特征可重复性有重大影响,表明方法学选择对特征稳健性具有关键影响。
  • 本研究识别出应在NSCLC多参数放射组学模型中优先考虑的特定特征类别和量化策略。

更好的研究,从现在开始

从阅读论文到最终审阅,大幅缩短您的研究时间。

无需绑定信用卡

本解读由 AI 生成,并经人工编辑审核。