Skip to main content

AI paper review, done before you submit

Proofreading, peer review, claim credibility, source quality, and tone of voice — catch reviewer-style issues in the editor and fix them before they reach your reviewers.

No credit card · Free plan available

Urban Green Space and Mental Health Outcomes

Urban Green Space and Mental Health Outcomes

Urban green space is closely associated with residents' mental health (Lee et al., 2024). Among residents visiting parks three or more times a week, stress went down a lot and perceived stress scores decreased by 23% and improvements in sleep quality were also observed (Park & Chen, 2025). This suggests green space accessibility should be treated as a core indicator in urban planning.

Weakly supported

The cited source only partially supports this claim. Add a source that addresses the outcome more directly.

1,247 words

Trusted by Students and Researchers Across the World

Georgia Tech
Emory University
UT Austin
Texas A&M
Seoul National University
Georgia Tech
Emory University
UT Austin
Texas A&M
Seoul National University
Georgia Tech
Emory University
UT Austin
Texas A&M
Seoul National University
Georgia Tech
Emory University
UT Austin
Texas A&M
Seoul National University

Proofread

Communicate your findings with clarity and authority. Proofread checks grammar, word choice, and formality against academic writing conventions and suggests edits.

Proofread

Generally sound. Some areas can better match academic conventions.

Word choiceAccept all

A lot of A majority (63%) of participants reported improvement.

Formality2

Polish your prose

Built for scholarly writing, Proofread suggests edits by category. Accept them one by one or all at once — you stay in control.

Learn more

Results in 30s

Your document is scanned and actionable suggestions appear within seconds.

Built for academia

Catches academic writing conventions and expression errors that generic grammar checkers miss.

Easy accept

Accept individual suggestions, entire categories, or everything at once. You're in full control.

Peer Review

Reads your paper the way reviewers will. It inspects structure, citation integrity, and statistical reporting, then returns scores on soundness, presentation, and contribution with reviewer-style comments.

Peer Review

6 suggestions

SoundnessPresentationContribution
Document structure2
Citation integrity3
Statistical reporting1

See rejection reasons early

Get the major and minor comments a real review would raise — before you submit, while you can still fix them.

Learn more

Three-axis scores

Soundness, presentation, and contribution are each scored so you can see where the paper is weak.

Reviewer-style comments

Checks what reviewers actually flag: missing structure, citation mismatches, statistical reporting errors.

Fix before submission

Every comment comes with its location and reasoning, so you know exactly what to revise.

Claim Credibility

Catches the risk hiding behind citations. Each claim is checked against the cited paper's text to verify it is actually supported, and issues are classified as overstated, misrepresented, or contradicted.

Claim Credibility

7 of 17 cited claims need attention.

Supported
Weakly supported2
Overstated1
Contradicted1
Unsupported3

Six verdicts for every claim

From fully supported to unsupported — make sure every cited claim accurately represents the literature before you submit.

Checked against sources

Claims are compared with the cited paper's actual text, not just its abstract.

Clear classification

Overstated, misrepresented, contradicted, or unsupported — each verdict comes with reasoning and a suggested edit.

Avoid rejection

Unverified claims are a common cause of peer review rejection. Filter them out before submission.

Source Quality

Audits your bibliography for weak spots. It flags retractions, preprints, and unverified journals — signals that weaken your research — and helps you resolve each one in your document.

Source Quality

3 preprints and 1 retracted paper found

Publication years

20162026
Retracted1
Preprint3
Unverified journal1

Your bibliography at a glance

Identify retracted papers, preprints, and unverified journals, with a publication-age distribution of your references.

Detect source risks

Automatically finds retractions, expressions of concern, and preprints that have a published version.

Understand your bibliography

See the publication-age distribution and journal verification status of your references.

Resolve immediately

Replace with the published version, find another source, or keep it intentionally.

Tone of Voice

Aligns your document's tone with academic writing conventions. It finds colloquial phrasing, heavy passive voice, and excessive hedging, then rewrites them in your field's register.

Tone of Voice

6 tone suggestions

Colloquial phrasing3
Passive voice heavy2
Excessive hedging1

The right register for your field

Check tone against a style preset or reference papers from your field, and keep it consistent across the document.

Consistent tone

Finds sections where the style drifts and evens out the whole document.

Your choice of baseline

Use a style preset or reference papers from your own field as the standard.

Expression fixes

Colloquialisms, passive overload, and over-hedging are rewritten in academic register.

FAQ

Submit your next paper with confidence

Run your first review within a minute of signing up.

No credit card · Free plan available