Journal of Pain
Elsevier BV · US · ISSN 15265900
What the numbers say
More articles but lower citation influence per article.
Field-weighted citation impact moved from 1.46 to 0.73. Expect lower average citedness for articles compared with before. Output grew sharply while citation impact fell. If aiming for high citation visibility, consider that trend when choosing where to submit. Pediatric Pain Management Techniques rose from 7.7% to 12.0% of what the journal runs. Works on pediatric pain approaches may find a larger audience here now. Authors from US went from 65.6% to 78.2%. The journal’s authorship is becoming more concentrated in the United States, which may affect reviewer and readership networks.
Citation metrics
Based on the Scopus and OpenAlex citation graphs. We do not provide Clarivate’s JCR Impact Factor.
Output and citation impact
Whether citation performance keeps up as output grows.
Topic shift
Share in the last 24 months (2024-09 – 2026-08) versus the previous 24 (2022-09 – 2024-08).
- Pediatric Pain Management Techniques7.7%→12.0%+4.2%pPrevNow
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation28.3%→24.4%−3.9%pPrevNow
Terms appearing more often
Wording in recent paper titles that stands out against the journal's own baseline.
Author countries
Last 24 months (2024-09 – 2026-08) against the previous 24 (2022-09 – 2024-08).
- US65.6%→78.3%+12.7%pPrevNow
- AU7.4%→4.9%−2.5%pPrevNow
- GB6.3%→4.4%−1.8%pPrevNow
- CA7.2%→4.0%−3.2%pPrevNow
- BE3.8%→2.9%−0.9%pPrevNow
- CN3.5%→2.2%−1.3%pPrevNow
Top 5 institutions
Top 5 institutions publishing in this journal, 2018 – 2026.
Recently published
20The 20 most recent papers — not the full list.
Most cited
20Top 20 most cited, 2018 – 2026.
Similar journals
Check your draft against this journal
Start free with Nubint AI — citation checks and a peer-review simulation.
Data as of 2026-09-05