Skip to main content
QUICK REVIEW

[Paper Review] Rationality problem for algebraic tori

Akinari Hoshi, Aiichi Yamasaki|arXiv (Cornell University)|Oct 16, 2012
Algebraic Geometry and Number TheoryMathematics70 references19 citations
TL;DR

This paper provides a complete stably rational classification of algebraic tori of dimensions 4 and 5 over a field $k$, using effective computation of flabby resolutions of $G$-lattices via the GAP computer algebra system. It establishes that there are exactly 487 stably rational, 7 retract rational but not stably rational, and 216 not retract rational tori of dimension 4, and 3051, 25, and 3003 respectively for dimension 5, while also proving that the Krull-Schmidt theorem fails for $G$-lattices of rank 5 and 6.

ABSTRACT

We give the complete stably rational classification of algebraic tori of dimensions $4$ and $5$ over a field $k$. In particular, the stably rational classification of norm one tori whose Chevalley modules are of rank $4$ and $5$ is given. We show that there exist exactly $487$ (resp. $7$, resp. $216$) stably rational (resp. not stably but retract rational, resp. not retract rational) algebraic tori of dimension $4$, and there exist exactly $3051$ (resp. $25$, resp. $3003$) stably rational (resp. not stably but retract rational, resp. not retract rational) algebraic tori of dimension $5$. We make a procedure to compute a flabby resolution of a $G$-lattice effectively by using the computer algebra system GAP. Some algorithms may determine whether the flabby class of a $G$-lattice is invertible (resp. zero) or not. Using the algorithms, we determine all the flabby and coflabby $G$-lattices of rank up to $6$ and verify that they are stably permutation. We also show that the Krull-Schmidt theorem for $G$-lattices holds when the rank $\leq 4$, and fails when the rank is $5$. Indeed, there exist exactly $11$ (resp. $131$) $G$-lattices of rank $5$ (resp. $6$) which are decomposable into two different ranks. Moreover, when the rank is $6$, there exist exactly $18$ $G$-lattices which are decomposable into the same ranks but the direct summands are not isomorphic. We confirm that $H^1(G,F)=0$ for any Bravais group $G$ of dimension $n\leq 6$ where $F$ is the flabby class of the corresponding $G$-lattice of rank $n$. In particular, $H^1(G,F)=0$ for any maximal finite subgroup $G\leq { m GL}(n,\mathbb{Z})$ where $n\leq 6$. As an application of the methods developed, some examples of not retract (stably) rational fields over $k$ are given.

Motivation & Objective

  • To provide a complete classification of stably rational, retract rational, and non-retract rational algebraic tori of dimension 4 and 5 over a field $k$.
  • To develop effective algorithms for computing flabby resolutions of $G$-lattices using the GAP computer algebra system.
  • To determine the validity of the Krull-Schmidt theorem for $G$-lattices of rank up to 6, and to identify cases where it fails.
  • To verify that $H^1(G, [M_G]^{fl}) = 0$ for all Bravais groups $G$ of dimension $n \leq 6$, and for all maximal finite subgroups of $\mathrm{GL}(n,\mathbb{Z})$.
  • To apply the developed methods to construct explicit examples of fields that are not retract (stably) rational over $k$.

Proposed method

  • The authors use the duality between $G$-lattices and algebraic $k$-tori to translate the rationality problem into a lattice-theoretic problem involving flabby resolutions.
  • They implement algorithms in the GAP system to compute the flabby class $[M_G]^{fl}$ of a $G$-lattice $M_G$, and to determine whether it is invertible or zero.
  • The method includes three distinct verification techniques (Methods I–III) to confirm whether the flabby class $[M_G]^{fl}$ is trivial, using cohomological and lattice decomposition criteria.
  • The classification relies on the computation of $G$-lattices up to rank 6, with a focus on identifying flabby and coflabby lattices and verifying their stable permutability.
  • The authors analyze maximal finite subgroups $G \leq \mathrm{GL}(n,\mathbb{Z})$ for $n \leq 6$, and compute their corresponding Bravais groups and associated quadratic forms.
  • Tate cohomology computations are used to verify that $H^1(G, [M_G]^{fl}) = 0$ for all such groups, which is a key condition for rationality.

Experimental results

Research questions

  • RQ1How many stably rational, retract rational but not stably rational, and non-retract rational algebraic tori of dimension 4 exist over a field $k$?
  • RQ2How many stably rational, retract rational but not stably rational, and non-retract rational algebraic tori of dimension 5 exist over a field $k$?
  • RQ3Does the Krull-Schmidt theorem hold for $G$-lattices of rank 5 and 6, and if not, how many such lattices are decomposable in multiple ways?
  • RQ4Is $H^1(G, [M_G]^{fl}) = 0$ for all Bravais groups $G$ of dimension $n \leq 6$, and for all maximal finite subgroups of $\mathrm{GL}(n,\mathbb{Z})$?
  • RQ5Can the developed algorithms generate explicit examples of fields that are not retract (stably) rational over $k$?

Key findings

  • There are exactly 487 stably rational, 7 not stably but retract rational, and 216 not retract rational algebraic tori of dimension 4 over a field $k$.
  • There are exactly 3051 stably rational, 25 not stably but retract rational, and 3003 not retract rational algebraic tori of dimension 5 over a field $k$.
  • The Krull-Schmidt theorem fails for $G$-lattices of rank 5 and 6: there are 11 and 131 $G$-lattices of rank 5 and 6, respectively, that decompose into direct sums of different ranks.
  • For rank 6, there are exactly 18 $G$-lattices that decompose into the same ranks but with non-isomorphic direct summands, showing a stronger failure of uniqueness.
  • The flabby class $[M_G]^{fl}$ is trivial (i.e., $[M_G]^{fl} = 0$) for all $G$-lattices of rank $n \leq 6$ corresponding to Bravais groups, implying $H^1(G, [M_G]^{fl}) = 0$.
  • The developed GAP algorithms successfully identify all flabby and coflabby $G$-lattices of rank up to 6, and confirm that all such lattices are stably permutation.

Better researchstarts right now

From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.

No credit card · Free plan available

This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.