Kyushu University · 경영학
마크 펜윅 교수의 연구실은 디지털 시대의 플랫폼 기반 기업과 그 규제, 특히 기업 거버넌스와 정책 대응에 초점을 맞추고 있습니다. 코로나19와 같은 글로벌 위기 상황에서 소셜 미디어와 디지털 플랫폼이 정책 반응에 미친 영향을 분석하며, 기술과 사회의 상호작용을 다룹니다. 또한 일본의 형사사법 제도에서의 보복성 공정론(_penal populism_) 개념을 재고함으로써, 시민의 안전과 정의에 대한 갈등 수요가 정책 형성에 어떻게 작용하는지 탐구합니다. 이 연구들은 디지털 기술이 사회적 갈등과 거버넌스 구조에 미치는 영향을 종합적으로 분석합니다.
표시된 성과는 수집된 데이터 기준으로 산출되며, 일부 차이가 있을 수 있습니다.
In a technology-driven, digital world, many of the largest and most successful businesses now operate as ‘platforms’. Such firms leverage networked technologies to facilitate economic exchange, transfer information, connect people, and make predictions. Platform companies are already disrupting multiple industries, including retail, hotels, taxis, and others, and are aggressively moving into new sectors, such as financial services. This paper examines the distinctive features of this new busines
Abstract Coronavirus is the first global crisis of a digital age and the divergence in policy responses reflects the challenge of navigating an unprecedented global situation under conditions of enormous uncertainty. We ask what lessons can be learned from this experience and identify two, both of which push against mainstream interpretations of recent events. First, and contrary to the view that the crisis exposed social media and Big Tech as a source of dangerous misinformation that needs to b
This article examines whether the concept of penal populism can be useful in understanding contemporary developments in Japanese criminal justice. In addressing this issue it is suggested that we need to draw a clear distinction between different conceptions of penal populism and, in particular, we should avoid equating penal populism with intensification of the severity of state punishment. A discussion of the Japanese experience highlights the importance of focusing on populism as a process by
