Skip to main content
QUICK REVIEW

[Paper Review] Deligne categories as limits in rank and characteristic

Nate Harman|arXiv (Cornell University)|Jan 13, 2016
Advanced Algebra and GeometryMathematics8 references18 citations
TL;DR

This paper establishes a novel connection between Deligne's categories $\underline{Rep}(GL_t)^{ab}$ and $\underline{Rep}(S_t)^{ab}$ in characteristic zero and modular representation theory of symmetric and general linear groups in large rank and large characteristic. Using ultraproducts via non-principal ultrafilters, it shows that these Deligne categories arise as limits of representations over $\overline{\mathbb{F}}_p$ as $p \to \infty$, enabling transfer of results between complex rank and positive characteristic settings.

ABSTRACT

We give new interpretations of the Deligne categories $\underline{Rep}(GL_t)$ and $\underline{Rep}(S_t)$ (and their abelian envelopes) over $\mathbb{C}$ in terms of modular representations of general linear and symmetric groups of large rank in large characteristic. In particular we make sense of the sentence "$\underline{Rep}(S_n)$ is the limit of $Rep(S_{p+n})$ over $\bar{\mathbb{F}}_p$ as $p$ goes to infinity". We then give examples of how to pass results between these different settings.

Motivation & Objective

  • To reinterpret Deligne's abelian tensor categories $\underline{Rep}(GL_t)^{ab}$ and $\underline{Rep}(S_t)^{ab}$ in characteristic zero as limits of modular representation categories over $\overline{\mathbb{F}}_p$.
  • To establish a rigorous framework using ultraproducts and ultrafilters to capture asymptotic behavior of representation categories as both rank and characteristic grow.
  • To enable transfer of results between modular representation theory in large characteristic and Deligne categories in complex rank.
  • To provide a new perspective on the structure of simple algebras and standard modules in Deligne categories via positive characteristic analogues.

Proposed method

  • Utilizes non-principal ultrafilters to construct ultraproducts of sequences of representation categories $\mathrm{Rep}(G_n, \overline{\mathbb{F}}_p)$ for $G_n = GL_n$ or $S_n$.
  • Defines the ultraproduct category $\widehat{\mathcal{C}}_\mathcal{U}$ as a limit category, with objects and morphisms as germs of sequences under the ultrafilter.
  • Restricts the ultraproduct to a manageable subcategory $\mathcal{C}_\mathcal{U}$ generated by regular representations, ensuring equivalence to Deligne’s categories.
  • Applies the ultraproduct construction to show that $\underline{Rep}(S_t)^{ab}$ is the limit of $\mathrm{Rep}(S_{p+n}, \overline{\mathbb{F}}_p)$ as $p \to \infty$.
  • Uses the equivalence of multiplicity in standard and irreducible modules in Deligne categories to relate positive characteristic and supergroup representation theory.
  • Establishes a correspondence between admissible weights in $\mathfrak{gl}(n+m|m)$ and highest weights in $\mathrm{Rep}(GL_{n+p}, \overline{\mathbb{F}}_p)$ via stabilized Kac module multiplicities.

Experimental results

Research questions

  • RQ1How can Deligne’s categories in complex rank be interpreted as limits of modular representation categories in large characteristic?
  • RQ2What is the precise role of ultrafilters in constructing a categorical limit that captures the asymptotic behavior of representation categories?
  • RQ3Can results from modular representation theory in large rank and characteristic be transferred to Deligne categories in complex rank?
  • RQ4How do the structures of standard and irreducible modules in $\mathrm{Rep}(GL_{n+p}, \overline{\mathbb{F}}_p)$ relate to those in supergroup representations $\mathrm{Rep}(GL(n+m|m))$?
  • RQ5What is the significance of stabilized Kac module multiplicities in the context of Deligne’s abelian envelopes?

Key findings

  • The abelian envelope $\underline{Rep}(S_t)^{ab}$ for transcendental $t$ is isomorphic to the ultraproduct limit of $\mathrm{Rep}(S_{p+n}, \overline{\mathbb{F}}_p)$ as $p \to \infty$, providing a new realization of Deligne’s category.
  • For fixed bipartitions $\lambda, \mu$, the multiplicity $[K(\lambda), L(\mu)]$ in $\mathrm{Rep}(GL(n+m|m))$ stabilizes as $m \to \infty$ and matches the multiplicity $[\Delta(\lambda), L(\mu)]$ in $\mathrm{Rep}(GL_{n+p}, \overline{\mathbb{F}}_p)$ for sufficiently large $p$.
  • The ultraproduct construction yields a category equivalent to $\underline{Rep}(GL_n)^{ab}$, showing that this Deligne category arises as a limit of modular representations in large characteristic.
  • The theory enables a characterization of simple commutative algebras in $\underline{Rep}(S_t)^{ab}$ by extending Etingof’s classification from $\mathbb{C}$ to algebraically closed fields in large characteristic.
  • The correspondence between modular representations and supergroup representations is formalized via stabilized Kac module multiplicities, linking positive characteristic and supergroup representation theory.
  • The paper provides a framework to transfer results between Deligne categories and modular representation theory, exemplified by explicit formulas for irreducible modular representations of symmetric groups.

Better researchstarts right now

From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.

No credit card · Free plan available

This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.