QUICK REVIEW
[Paper Review] Resolved mass assembly and star formation in Milky Way Progenitors since $z = 5$ from JWST/CANUCS: From clumps and mergers to well-ordered disks
Vivian Yun Yan Tan, Adam Muzzin|arXiv (Cornell University)|Dec 10, 2024
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research4 citations
TL;DR
This study uses deep JWST/CANUCS photometry across 18–21 bands to resolve stellar mass and star formation rate maps of 909 Milky Way progenitor galaxies from z=5 to z=0.3. It reveals inside-out mass assembly, increasing outer sSFR up to z≈2, and a transition from chaotic, merger-dominated systems to well-ordered disks by z<3, with half-mass radii doubling and Sérsic indices remaining near n≈1.
ABSTRACT
We present a resolved study of 877 progenitors of Milky Way Analogs (MWAs) at $0.3
Motivation & Objective
- To trace the resolved mass assembly and star formation evolution of Milky Way progenitors from z=5 to z=0.3 using high-resolution photometry.
- To determine whether Milky Way analogs (MWAs) evolved through inside-out growth, as predicted by disk formation models.
- To quantify the role of mergers, clumpiness, and structural disturbances in shaping early MWA evolution.
- To assess how morphological and star formation properties evolve with redshift, particularly around cosmic noon (z≈2).
- To link observed structural changes to physical mechanisms like bursty star formation and dynamical heating from mergers.
Proposed method
- Selected 909 Milky Way progenitor candidates via abundance matching in the CANUCS survey fields, covering 0.3<z<5.
- Applied Dense Basis spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting to 18–21-band photometry from NIRCam, NIRISS, and HST to produce spatially resolved stellar mass and SFR maps.
- Constructed radial profiles of stellar mass and specific star formation rate (sSFR) to analyze inside-out growth and evolution with redshift.
- Used the Gini-M20 plane and asymmetry parameters (CAS and RMS) to classify galaxies as disturbed or undergoing mergers based on mass map morphology.
- Measured Sérsic indices and half-mass radii (Re) to track structural evolution and disk growth over time.
- Stacked sSFR and mass profiles at different redshift bins (z≈5, 4, 3, 2, 1.75, 0.5) to analyze average trends in star formation and mass distribution.

Experimental results
Research questions
- RQ1How does the stellar mass assembly of Milky Way progenitors evolve with redshift, and is it consistent with inside-out growth?
- RQ2How does the specific star formation rate (sSFR) profile evolve in space and time, particularly in inner versus outer regions?
- RQ3To what extent do mergers and structural disturbances shape the early evolution of Milky Way analogs at z>3?
- RQ4How do Sérsic indices and half-mass radii evolve, and what do they imply about the formation of disk-like structures?
- RQ5What is the relationship between clumpy star formation and underlying mass distribution across cosmic time?
Key findings
- The stellar mass in the inner 2 kpc of MWA progenitors remains nearly constant at 10^9.3–9.4 M☉ from z=5 to z=2, indicating minimal inner mass growth.
- Stellar mass in outer regions (R>2 kpc) increases by 0.8 dex—from 10^7.5 M☉ to 10^8.3 M☉—between z=5 and z=2, confirming strong inside-out growth.
- The sSFR of outer regions increases with decreasing redshift, peaking at z≈2, and only begins to decline after cosmic noon (z≈1.75), while inner sSFR decreases steadily.
- Median Sérsic indices remain nearly constant at n≈1 from z=5 to z=0.3, indicating sustained disk dominance, while half-mass radii double from z=5 to z=3 and again from z=3 to z=0.3.
- At 4<z<5, 45.8±13.8% to 62.5±16.1% of galaxies are classified as disturbed, and 16.7±8.3% are classified as ongoing mergers, with both fractions decreasing toward lower redshift.
- Clumpiness in stellar mass maps is highest at z>4 (but <20% of galaxies), while SFR clumpiness increases at lower redshift, though with lower burstiness, indicating star formation becomes less tightly correlated with mass density over time.

Better researchstarts right now
From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.
No credit card · Free plan available
This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.