東北大学 · 医学
Hiratsuka教授の研究室は、がん末期における予後予測と緩和ケアの質の向上を目的としており、特に患者の生死予測に関する認識のズレや医療者とのコミュニケーションのあり方を解明しています。日本と韓国を比較した国際的・文化的な視点からの予後予測ツールの有効性評価や、精神的安らぎに寄与する要因の特定にも取り組んでいます。医療現場における意思決定支援のための客観的かつ文化的に配慮された予後情報の提供方法の確立が、今後の研究の柱です。
Figures are computed from collected data and may differ slightly.
This study found novel factors related to spiritual well-being in the last days of life, several of which differed according to country. Recognition of factors associated with spiritual well-being can improve the quality of palliative care.
Fewer than 50% of Japanese patients with unresectable/recurrent cancer agreed with their physicians, whereas most others were more optimistic about palliative care communication and their health condition as compared to physicians. Effective communication is essential to ensure informed decisionmaking.
This paper aimed to summarize the current situation of prognostication for patients with an expected survival of weeks or months, and to clarify future research priorities. Prognostic information is essential for patients, their families, and medical professionals to make end-of-life decisions. The clinician's prediction of survival is often used, but this may be inaccurate and optimistic. Many prognostic tools, such as the Palliative Performance Scale, Palliative Prognostic Index, Palliative Pr
A majority of the patients with advanced cancer in this study had prognostic awareness that was more optimistic in comparison with their actual survival, and most were more optimistic than their physicians about their prognosis. Further research is needed to develop programs to facilitate the discussion of life expectancy with patients in a manner that is consistent with their preferences.
Both OPS and PaP showed good performance in Japan and Korea. Compared with PaP, OPS could be more useful for inexperienced physicians who hesitate to estimate CPS.
Longitudinal assessment of depression, sleep disturbance and dyspnea may be useful in prognostication of patients with advanced cancer. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings with more consecutive assessments in diverse populations.
We showed a discrepancy of approximately 30-80% in the accuracy of CPS among three different analysis methods: distribution, AUROC, and AS comparison. Considering the low accuracy of AS comparisons, clinicians should provide a wide range of survival time. CPS was able to effectively discriminate and may be useful for risk stratification.
There was no significant difference in the prevalence of AEs among oxycodone, fentanyl, hydromorphone, and tramadol, which are commonly used for analgesic treatment in Japan.
Open papers in the app to read, cite, and organize with AI.