Skip to main content
QUICK REVIEW

[論文レビュー] Data augmentation using learned transformations for one-shot medical image segmentation

Amy Zhao, Guha Balakrishnan|arXiv (Cornell University)|Feb 25, 2019
Medical Image Segmentation Techniques参考文献 79被引用数 57
ひとこと要約

本論文は、ラベルなしMRIスキャンから空間変換と外観変換を学習する半教師付きデータ拡張法を提案し、単一のアトラスからラベル付き例を合成することでワンショット脳MRI分割を改善します。手動調整のデータ拡張法や単一アトラスベースラインを上回り、完全に教師ありの性能に近づきます。

ABSTRACT

Image segmentation is an important task in many medical applications. Methods based on convolutional neural networks attain state-of-the-art accuracy; however, they typically rely on supervised training with large labeled datasets. Labeling medical images requires significant expertise and time, and typical hand-tuned approaches for data augmentation fail to capture the complex variations in such images. We present an automated data augmentation method for synthesizing labeled medical images. We demonstrate our method on the task of segmenting magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scans. Our method requires only a single segmented scan, and leverages other unlabeled scans in a semi-supervised approach. We learn a model of transformations from the images, and use the model along with the labeled example to synthesize additional labeled examples. Each transformation is comprised of a spatial deformation field and an intensity change, enabling the synthesis of complex effects such as variations in anatomy and image acquisition procedures. We show that training a supervised segmenter with these new examples provides significant improvements over state-of-the-art methods for one-shot biomedical image segmentation. Our code is available at https://github.com/xamyzhao/brainstorm.

研究の動機と目的

  • Address the challenge of limited labeled data in medical image segmentation.
  • Develop an automated augmentation framework that leverages unlabeled scans.
  • Synthesize diverse labeled training examples by modeling spatial and appearance transformations.
  • Demonstrate improvements over state-of-the-art one-shot segmentation methods on brain MRI data.

提案手法

  • Model a spatial transformation using a learned displacement field via a VoxelMorph-based registration network.
  • Model an appearance/intensity transformation as a per-voxel addition learned with a semantically-aware smoothness regularizer.
  • Synthesize labeled examples by applying independent spatial and appearance transforms to a single labeled atlas, ensuring labels follow the warped image.
  • Train a supervised segmentation network on the augmented labeled dataset.
  • Evaluate using Dice scores across 30 brain structures on a held-out test set.
  • Implementation uses differentiable 3D spatial transformer layers and trains transforms with a dedicated loss combining image similarity and smoothness terms.

実験結果

リサーチクエスチョン

  • RQ1Can learned spatial and appearance transformations from unlabeled MRIs produce realistic labeled augmentations when applied to a single atlas?
  • RQ2Do these learned augmentations improve one-shot brain MRI segmentation beyond hand-tuned augmentation and single-atlas methods?
  • RQ3How close can one-shot segmentation get to fully supervised performance using synthesized examples?
  • RQ4Is independence of spatial and appearance transforms advantageous for generating diverse training data?

主な発見

手法Diceスコアペアワイズ Dice 改善
SAS0.759 (0.137)-
SAS-aug0.775 (0.147)0.016 (0.041)
Rand-aug0.765 (0.143)0.006 (0.088)
Ours-coupled0.795 (0.133)0.036 (0.036)
Ours-indep0.804 (0.130)0.045 (0.038)
Ours-indep + rand-aug0.815 (0.123)0.056 (0.044)
Supervised (upper bound)0.849 (0.092)0.089 (0.072)
  • Ours-indep achieves Dice score of 0.804 (0.130) on average, outperforming SAS baseline and rand-aug.
  • Ours-indep + rand-aug attains 0.815 (0.123) Dice on average, the best among one-shot methods.
  • Ours-coupled reaches 0.795 (0.133), better than SAS and SAS-aug baselines.
  • SAS baseline Dice score is 0.759 (0.137) and SAS-aug is 0.775 (0.147).
  • Fully supervised upper bound yields 0.849 (0.092).
  • The proposed method yields significant improvements over baselines (p<1e-15 vs rand-aug; p<1e-20 vs SAS) across 100 test subjects.

より良い研究を、今すぐ始めましょう

論文設計から論文執筆まで、研究時間を劇的に削減しましょう。

クレジットカード登録不要

このレビューはAIが作成し、人間の編集者が確認しました。