Skip to main content
QUICK REVIEW

[論文レビュー] Semantic Tool Discovery for Large Language Models: A Vector-Based Approach to MCP Tool Selection

Sarat Mudunuri, Jian Wan|arXiv (Cornell University)|Mar 19, 2026
Topic Modeling被引用数 0
ひとこと要約

The paper presents a semantic, vector-based tool-discovery layer for MCP that dynamically selects 3 top tools per query to minimize token usage while maintaining high tool-calling accuracy.

ABSTRACT

Large Language Models (LLMs) with tool-calling capabilities have demonstrated remarkable potential in executing complex tasks through external tool integration. The Model Context Protocol (MCP) has emerged as a standardized framework for connecting LLMs to diverse toolsets, with individual MCP servers potentially exposing dozens to hundreds of tools. However, current implementations face a critical scalability challenge: providing all available tools to the LLM context results in substantial token overhead, increased costs, reduced accuracy, and context window constraints. We present a semantic tool discovery architecture that addresses these challenges through vector-based retrieval. Our approach indexes MCP tools using dense embeddings that capture semantic relationships between tool capabilities and user intent, dynamically selecting only the most relevant tools (typically 3-5) rather than exposing the entire tool catalog (50-100+). Experimental results demonstrate a 99.6% reduction in tool-related token consumption with a hit rate of 97.1% at K=3 and an MRR of 0.91 on a benchmark of 140 queries across 121 tools from 5 MCP servers, with sub-100ms retrieval latency. Contributions include: (1) a semantic indexing framework for MCP tools, (2) a dynamic tool selection algorithm based on query-tool similarity, (3) comprehensive evaluation demonstrating significant efficiency and accuracy improvements, and (4) extensibility to multi-agent and cross-organizational tool discovery.

研究の動機と目的

  • Motivate the scalability challenge of MCP tool provisioning in LLMs due to token overhead and context-window limits.
  • Propose a semantic indexing architecture that uses dense embeddings to map tool capabilities to user intent.
  • Evaluate token efficiency, tool-selection accuracy, latency, and cost across multiple MCP servers.
  • Demonstrate open-source implementation and discuss extensions to multi-agent systems and cross-organizational tool discovery.

提案手法

  • Index MCP tools by extracting schemas and constructing semantic tool documents.
  • Generate query and tool embeddings with text-embedding-ada-002 and store in Milvus vector store.
  • Retrieve top-K tools by cosine/dot-product similarity and optionally apply thresholding and re-ranking.
  • Inject selected tools into the LLM context for tool calls and aggregate results for response generation.
  • Provide a feedback loop for refining embeddings and retrieval parameters.

実験結果

リサーチクエスチョン

  • RQ1Can semantic similarity between user queries and tool descriptions enable effective dynamic tool selection in MCP systems?
  • RQ2What is the quantitative impact of semantic tool filtering on token efficiency, cost, and system performance?
  • RQ3How does semantic tool selection affect LLM accuracy in tool calling compared to providing all available tools?
  • RQ4What are the optimal parameters (number of tools retrieved, similarity threshold, embedding model) for balancing recall and precision?

主な発見

KPrecision@KRecall@KF1@KHit Rate@KMRRToken ReductionLatency (ms)
192.1%31.5%46.9%85.0%0.850099.6%87.1
270.0%48.3%57.0%95.7%0.903699.6%90.2
357.6%59.6%58.4%97.1%0.908399.6%87.8
542.1%72.5%53.2%97.1%0.908399.6%87.0
1026.5%90.6%40.9%98.6%0.910799.6%88.1
  • Semantic similarity enables effective dynamic tool selection with a hit rate of 97.1% at K=3.
  • Token reduction is 99.6% across all K values and servers.
  • MRR remains around 0.91 for K≥3, indicating early correct tool surface within top results.
  • Optimal operating point is K=3, balancing precision and recall (F1=58.4%).
  • Retrieval latency stays below 91 ms across configurations.
  • Per-server performance varies with catalog distinctiveness, e.g., MySQL and GitHub showing higher precision at low K.

より良い研究を、今すぐ始めましょう

論文設計から論文執筆まで、研究時間を劇的に削減しましょう。

クレジットカード登録不要

このレビューはAIが作成し、人間の編集者が確認しました。