원유미 교수

Abstract Confronted with COVID-19, states have taken emergency measures derogating from human rights obligations. With the pandemic now declared over, it is time to review state practice and the derogation systems under international human rights treaties. This article examines all 373 notifications sent from states to the treaty organs of three treaties—the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), and the American Convention o

While both international human rights law and constitutional law protect fundamental rights of individuals, it remains a question to what extent and for what purpose constitutional justice uses IHR instruments. This article offers empirical research on the use of IHR instruments with a case study of South Korea. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted for all sixty-five decisions from the Constitutional Court of Korea that mentioned IHR instruments from 1988 to 2015. Findings show t

In times of public emergency, states take emergency measures to control the national crisis and restore public order. These emergency measures often restrict individuals' freedom and rights that are protected under international human rights treaties. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, in its article 4, allows states to derogate from their obligations under the Covenant in time of public emergency. This is to adopt emergency measures to control crisis and, more importantly

이 논문은 헌법재판소가 설립 이후 30년 동안 (1988-2018) 위헌결정을 내릴 때 어떤 국제인권조약을 어떻게 인용하였는지 분석한 글이다. 국제인권조약을 언급한 위헌결정을 헌법재판소장이 바뀌었던 6년 단위로 나누어 보면 가장 잘 드러나는 것은 우리 사회의 시대상이다. 국제인권조약이 원용되었던 사건의 내용을 보면 국제인권조약의 설득력이 필요했던 당시의 현안이 무엇이었는지, 우리 사회가 어떻게 변화해왔는지 알 수 있다. 헌법재판소는 재판 당시를 기준으로 국내인권현실이 국제인권기준과 동떨어진 사안에서 국제인권조약을 언급하며 위헌결정을 하였다.BR 헌법재판소 위헌결정에 나타난 국제인권법의 모습을 살펴보면, 헌법재판소가 설립되었던 90년대 초반에는 권위에 대한 도전을 허용하고 개인의 자유를 보장하기 위해 세계인권선언과 자유권규약을 언급하였다. 90년대 중반에는 우리 법체계 내에 양성평등이 확립되었음을 선언하는 맥락에서 여성차별철폐협약을 언급하였다. 2000년대 초중반에는 당시 중요한 현안

que dans les limites des conditions générales d'utilisation du site ou, le cas échéant, des conditions générales de la licence souscrite par votre établissement.

Through a use of both qualitative and quantitative methodologies, Won provides a nuanced analysis and discussion of the factors and domestic processes influencing the implementation of United Nations Human Rights Committee (UNHRC) recommendations in South Korea and Japan, as well as across the globe. Won’s research entangles the theoretical debate on whether the UN human rights treaty system is effective in prompting the implementation of HRC recommendations. Based on interviews with activists,

Las expresiones que critican al jefe de estado, las instituciones gubernamentales o los funcionarios públicos con frecuencia son sancionadas con castigo penal por su uso de lenguaje despectivo e irrespetuoso, denominado en la ley "insultos". Este artículo analiza cuatro decisiones de revisión judicial de la Corte Suprema de México y la Corte Constitucional de Corea con respecto a las leyes de insulto desde la perspectiva tanto del derecho internacional de los derechos humanos como del derecho co