조대하 교수
Daeha Cho
한양대학교 경제금융학부 · 경제학
연구실 소개
조대하 교수의 연구실은 금융제약, 이주성 소비자 행동, 불완전한 금융시장이 거시경제에 미치는 영향을 중심으로 연구를 전개합니다. 특히 소비자 간의 소비성향 차이, 실업 위험에 대한 예비저축 동기, 금융시장의 비완전성 등이 거시경제 변동성과 복지에 어떻게 작용하는지 분석합니다. 이는 정책 효과성 평가, 특히 통화정책과 금융감독정책의 역할을 이해하는 데 기여합니다. 특히, 대표자 모델을 넘어서 다양한 가계의 이주성과 복지 영향을 고려한 거시거시정책 설계에 초점을 맞추고 있습니다.
연구 현황
연구 성과 추이
표시된 성과는 수집된 데이터 기준으로 산출되며, 일부 차이가 있을 수 있습니다.
주요 논문
15This paper uses an estimated Heterogeneous Agent New Keynesian (HANK) model to evaluate the quantitative importance of two channels in driving aggregate consumption fluctuations in the US: (i) precautionary savings against unemployment risk and (ii) MPC heterogeneity. I find that MPC heterogeneity is the dominant channel because a large fraction of households are close to the borrowing limit. The empirical average MPC target in HANK generates counterfactually volatile aggregate consumption, and
Complete financial markets are widely believed to be beneficial for the international economy, since they enable cross-country risk-sharing. Using a two-country New Keynesian model , we show that this is not the case if the source of income fluctuations is a country-specific markup shock. When preferences involve the wealth effect on labor supply and imply that Home and Foreign goods are Edgeworth substitutes, the absence of risk-sharing in autarky acts like a favorable markup shock, reducing th
Abstract This paper quantitatively examines which of the following three widely-used leaning-against-the-wind policies is effective in stabilizing aggregate fluctuations: i) a monetary policy that responds to the loan-to-GDP ratio, ii) a countercyclical LTV policy, and iii) a countercyclical capital requirement policy. In particular, we estimate a New Keynesian model with financial frictions using U.S. data and find that a monetary policy rule that responds positively to the loan-to-GDP ratio Am
This paper departs from the representative-agent assumption and investigates how optimal monetary policy should be conducted in a two-agent New Keynesian (TANK) model. Relative to a price stability motive that typically appears as policy prescriptions in representative-agent New Keynesian (RANK) models, heterogeneity adds a motive to spread aggregate fluctuations equally across all households. We show that the latter motive hinges on how fiscal transfers are implemented with the business cycle.
This paper studies the implications of financial frictions on the welfare effects of business cycles, using the agency cost model of Carlstrom and Fuerst (1997). We decompose the total welfare effects of business cycles into the fluctuation and mean effect. We find that whether financial frictions reduce the total welfare or not, for any given shock, depends on the size of the mean effect. The presence of financial frictions reduces the mean effect and thus the welfare in response to aggregate p
대표 연구 분야
조대하 교수의 연구를 Nubint에서 더 깊이 살펴보세요
이 연구실의 논문을 앱에서 열어 AI와 함께 읽고, 핵심을 요약하고, 내 글에 인용하세요.