김도현 교수
Dohyun Kim
성균관대학교 경영학과 · 경영학
연구실 소개
김도현 교수의 연구실은 조직의 학습, 적응 및 지속 가능성에 초점을 맞춘 다학제적 연구를 수행합니다. 특히 탐색과 이용의 균형, 환경의 변동성, 조직 내부 다양성, 초기 성공의 영향 등 조직 성과에 영향을 미치는 핵심 요인들을 시뮬레이션 모델과 이론적 분석을 통해 탐구합니다. 또한 기업의 사회적 책임(CSR) 활동과 경영진 소유지분의 역할 등 조직 거버넌스와 성과 피드백 메커니즘의 상호작용에 대해서도 깊이 있는 분석을 진행하고 있습니다. 이는 조직의 장기적 생존과 성장을 위한 전략적 의사결정 이론을 구축하는 데 기여합니다.
연구 현황
연구 성과 추이
표시된 성과는 수집된 데이터 기준으로 산출되며, 일부 차이가 있을 수 있습니다.
주요 논문
15Scholars have demonstrated substantial interest in the exploration–exploitation framework since the publication of March, James G (born 1928) seminal paper in 1991. The notions of exploration and exploitation and the trade-offs between them are briefly introduced, followed by investigation of their origins within March and his colleagues’ earlier works. Finally, current issues, especially those regarding conceptualizations and assumptions underlying the trade-offs between them, are discussed.
This article proposes that specific features of environmental dynamism and the notion of internal variety should be taken into consideration in response to caveats in prior research on choice or balance between exploration and exploitation and its implications for organizational performance. The study extends March's exploration—exploitation model by (1) conceptualizing and varying two dimensions — amplitude and frequency — of environmental dynamism and (2) articulating the notion of internal va
This study warns organizations against falling into an “early success trap.” The timing of initial success may lead organizations to divergent evolutionary paths as their experience at early ages has a greater consequence for their evolution than does their experience at later ages. In particular, we propose that early initial success can be more detrimental to an organization’s performance and survivability than later initial success because exploratory competence takes a long time to develop.
This study investigates what determines social actors’ motivations and opportunities to risk changing their current courses of action and the extent to which they are likely to change, by integrating structural and behavioral perspectives on decision making. Behavioral perspectives argue that performance relative to aspirations determines the actors’ risk preference and motivation to change, while structural perspectives suggest that the actors’ choices and actions are enabled and constrained by
The growing importance of corporate social responsibility (CSR) for firms’ sustainability has been spurring scholarly attempts at identifying the antecedents of CSR activities. This study examines how CEO ownership differentially affects firms’ CSR activities in response to their performance relative to aspirations. Building upon the agency theory and the performance feedback model, we argue that CEOs with greater ownership are relatively more likely to increase their firms’ CSR activities than
Latitudinal trends in cold tolerance have been observed in many terrestrial ectotherms, but few studies have investigated interpopulational variation in the cold physiology of marine invertebrates. Here, the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus was used as a model system to study how local adaptation influences the cold tolerance of a broadly distributed marine crustacean. Among five populations spanning 18° in latitude, the following three metrics were used to compare cold tolerance: the t
This study focuses on the joint effects of the firms’ access to structural holes within social networks and their status within social hierarchy on their innovation performance. The interactions between the firms’ positions in different dimensions of social structures have been rarely examined in prior research despite the fact that they jointly determine the firms’ opportunities and constraints for acquiring important resources, such as knowledge and information, for their innovation activities
Scholars have demonstrated substantial interest in the exploration–exploitation framework since the publication of March, James G. (born 1928) seminal paper in 1991. The notions of exploration and exploitation and the trade-offs between them are briefly introduced, followed by investigation of their origins within March and his colleagues’ earlier works. Finally, current issues, especially those regarding conceptualizations and assumptions underlying the trade-offs between them, are discussed.
Purpose This paper investigates how a firm's status moderates the performance of its investment portfolio diversification strategy. We combine the investment diversification literature with the organizational status theory, arguing that status would weaken the benefits of a specialist strategy in their niche industry of investments while strengthening the positive consequences of a generalist strategy across various industries. Design/methodology/approach We collected our data using the Securiti
Purpose Organizational reputation and status are similar yet distinct constructs, serving as signals conveying information about an organization and its products and thus constituting audiences' perceptions about the organization. However, compared to status, reputation tends to change more dynamically over time. In this study, the authors argue that the dynamic traits of reputation – particularly, its momentum and volatility – may serve as additional signals and/or noises, influencing potential
Although improving energy efficiency has many benefits, including not only reducing pollution and climate change but also enhancing productivity and competitiveness, many firms still do not adopt energy efficiency innovation. In this study, we suggest inadequate attention allocation as a barrier to energy efficiency innovation, making firms fall into the intention-achievement gap when they simultaneously pursue multiple innovation-related goals. Due to limits in attention resources, competing in
대표 연구 분야
김도현 교수의 연구를 Nubint에서 더 깊이 살펴보세요
이 연구실의 논문을 앱에서 열어 AI와 함께 읽고, 핵심을 요약하고, 내 글에 인용하세요.