이재길 교수
Jae-Gil Lee
KAIST 김재철AI대학원 · 컴퓨터과학
연구실 소개
이재길 교수의 연구실은 이동 객체의 이동 패턴을 효율적으로 분석하고자, 전체 경로를 넘어서 부분 경로(서브트래잭터리)에 초점을 맞춘 데이터 마이닝 기법을 주요 연구 주제로 다룹니다. 특히, 선분으로 분할하는 '파트리션 앤 그룹/다이내믹' 프레임워크를 기반으로 공통 서브트래잭터리 탐지, 이상치 서브경로 탐지, 그리고 도로망 기반 이동 패턴의 분류 등 실생활 응용이 가능한 지능형 이동 데이터 분석 기법을 개발하고 있습니다. GPS 및 RFID 기술의 발전에 발맞춰 교통 관리, 도시 계획, 생명의료 분석 등 다양한 분야에서의 응용 가능성을 추구합니다.
연구 현황
연구 성과 추이
표시된 성과는 수집된 데이터 기준으로 산출되며, 일부 차이가 있을 수 있습니다.
주요 논문
15Existing trajectory clustering algorithms group similar trajectories as a whole, thus discovering common trajectories. Our key observation is that clustering trajectories as a whole could miss common sub-trajectories. Discovering common sub-trajectories is very useful in many applications, especially if we have regions of special interest for analysis. In this paper, we propose a new partition-and-group framework for clustering trajectories, which partitions a trajectory into a set of line segme
Outlier detection has been a popular data mining task. However, there is a lack of serious study on outlier detection for trajectory data. Even worse, an existing trajectory outlier detection algorithm has limited capability to detect outlying sub-trajectories. In this paper, we propose a novel partition-and-detect framework for trajectory outlier detection, which partitions a trajectory into a set of line segments, and then, detects outlying line segments for trajectory outliers. The primary ad
Trajectory classification, i.e. , model construction for predicting the class labels of moving objects based on their trajectories and other features, has many important, real-world applications. A number of methods have been reported in the literature, but due to using the shapes of whole trajectories for classification, they have limited classification capability when discriminative features appear at parts of trajectories or are not relevant to the shapes of trajectories. These situations are
Classification has been used for modeling many kinds of data sets, including sets of items, text documents, graphs, and networks. However, there is a lack of study on a new kind of data, trajectories on road networks. Modeling such data is useful with the emerging GPS and RFID technologies and is important for effective transportation and traffic planning. In this work, we study methods for classifying trajectories on road networks. By analyzing the behavior of trajectories on road networks, we
BACKGROUND: Biomedical named-entity recognition (BioNER) is widely modeled with conditional random fields (CRF) by regarding it as a sequence labeling problem. The CRF-based methods yield structured outputs of labels by imposing connectivity between the labels. Recent studies for BioNER have reported state-of-the-art performance by combining deep learning-based models (e.g., bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory) and CRF. The deep learning-based models in the CRF-based methods are dedicated to es
Discovering trajectory patterns is shown to be very useful in learning interactions between moving objects. Many types of trajectory patterns have been proposed in the literature, but previous methods were developed for only a specific type of trajectory patterns. This limitation could make pattern discovery tedious and inefficient since users typically do not know which types of trajectory patterns are hidden in their data sets. Our main observation is that many trajectory patterns can be arran
Compression has historically been used to reduce the cost of storage, I/Os from that storage, and buffer pool utilization, at the expense of the CPU required to decompress data every time it is queried. However, significant additional CPU efficiencies can be achieved by deferring decompression as late in query processing as possible and performing query processing operations directly on the still-compressed data. In this paper, we investigate the benefits and challenges of performing joins on co
Responsible AI becomes critical where robustness and fairness must be satisfied together. Traditionally, the two topics have been studied by different communities for different applications. Robust training is designed for noisy or poisoned data where image data is typically considered. In comparison, fair training primarily deals with biased data where structured data is typically considered. Nevertheless, robust training and fair training are fundamentally similar in considering that both of t
대표 연구 분야
이재길 교수의 연구를 Nubint에서 더 깊이 살펴보세요
이 연구실의 논문을 앱에서 열어 AI와 함께 읽고, 핵심을 요약하고, 내 글에 인용하세요.