최태현 교수

In spite of attempting to implement e-government innovations to enhance efficiency in public organizations for several decades, e-government innovation has often not met the expectations of citizens, legislatures, or the organizations. Although a wide range of causes from poor planning to improper implementation have been suggested for explanation of failures, it is still challenging to theoretically construct an explanation of what the overarching dynamic is behind those causes. To further deve

Innovation in the public sector has long been criticized for its failure to fulfill expectations of higher efficiency and better service. Scholars have reported disappointing results in implementing successful innovations. In this article, we develop a conceptual framework that emphasizes organizations’ capacity to maintain balance between new innovations and refinement of existing knowledge. We use the concept of exploration and exploitation, commonly applied to private organizations, to analyz

Abstract The purpose of this study is to contribute to development of collaborative governance theory by investigating whether and under what conditions a deliberative, consensus-oriented decision process among diverse stakeholders with conflicting interests can lead to decisions that are satisfactory to most of the stakeholders. Using computational simulation, we found that the benefits of collaborative governance are contingent on such conditions as the type of alternative that initiates the d

ABSTRACT Collaborative governance forums involving many diverse stakeholders sometimes use caucuses to facilitate deliberation of the complex issues they face. However, given the paucity of research on this topic, a better theoretical understanding of the conditions under which a caucus structure is likely to be effective is warranted. For this study, we developed a computational model of decision making in collaborative forums to explore how a caucus structure can be designed and managed to ena

The significant reforms being implemented in governance systems around the world reflect a broader transition of society from the modern to a new emerging era. This transition is framed in terms of a shift from a mechanistic to an ecological worldview, stimulated by a number of developments during the twentieth century and the last decade. In contrast to the mechanistic orientation toward reductionism, prediction and control, and competition, an ecological worldview emphasizes the interconnected

Collaborative governance systems are likely to be populated by participants with a mix of social or public service motivations, including both proself and prosocial orientations. However, these variations in motivation have not been adequately considered in the development of theory regarding participants' interaction and group performance in collaborative governance. For this study, we develop an agent-based simulation model that incorporates insights from public administration, social psycholo

Authentic dialogue is a key component of deliberative democracy. Public administration scholars and practitioners have focused on institutional settings for authentic dialogue, but they have paid less attention to behavioral aspects, especially the emotional component, of authentic dialogue. The author proposes a conceptual framework for authentic dialogue that highlights the three dimensions of its social‐behavioral foundation: epistemic, social, and compassionate information processing motivat

Purpose The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of agent-based modeling as an alternative method for public administration research. It is focused on encouraging public administration scholars to come to better understanding of the method. Design/methodology/approach This article performed a comprehensive review of methodological issues relative to agent-based modeling. Findings After reviewing the current research themes in public administration and the methodological nature of ag

한국의 정치행정문화에서 민본사상은 매우 강력한 통치문화의 기반을 제공하고 있다. 최근에는 민주주의에서민본사상의 의의와 한계에 대해 꾸준히 논의가 전개되고 있다. 이처럼 한국사회와 학문 공히 영향을 미치고있는 민본사상이 현대 민주 행정에 가지고 있는 적실성을 면밀히 검토할 필요가 있다. 이 논문의 목적은 민본사상이 민주주의와 함께 현대 행정학의 반응성 개념의 이론적 난제들에 어떤 함의를 제시할 수 있는지를 비판적으로 검토하고, 이를 통해 관 주도의 행정/정책 문화가 제도화된 한국 행정에서 민본사상의 문화적 요소들이 가지고 있는 실천적 쟁점들을 드러내는 것이다. 이 논문에서는 ‘민’의 의미, 민의 필요를 파악함에 있어서민과 행정의 관계, 그리고 반응성의 평가를 중심으로 반응성의 이론적 논점들을 파악한 후 민본사상과 민주주의가 이러한 논점들에 어떤 대답을 제시할 수 있는지 분석하였다. 분석 결과 민주적 행정의 맥락에서 행정의반응성 이해의 어려움에 대해 민본사상 역시 민주주의와 유사한 문제

In research on policy learning, target groups’ responses have been insufficiently investigated. This article aims to expand the theory of policy learning by focusing on the effect of policy layering on disparity in learning among target groups, and its social consequences. Using the case of South Korea’s education policy, we show that policy layering to pursue multiple goals over 25 years has resulted in a complexly layered policy structure that has generated a discriminatory effect among differ

최근 한국에서 ‘적극행정’에 대한 논의가 활발히 전개되고 있다. 그러나 그에 대한 공공철학적토대에 대한 논의는 아직 미흡한 상태에 있다. 이 논문에서는 기존의 논의와 처방이 통제 중심시각에서 이루어지는 것의 한계를 지적하고, 공익실현 중심 시각에서 접근할 필요성에 대해 논의한다. 헤겔, 베버, 윌슨의 고전적 관료관, 그리고 신행정학과 생태론을 포함하는 현대적 관료관을 각각분석하여, 적극행정이 전제하고 있는 공익실현적 관료의 철학적･윤리적 기반을 모색해 본다. 그결과 고전적 및 현대적 관료관으로부터 적극행정을 긍정하는 다양한 철학적･윤리적 기반을 시사받을 수 있으나, 그 한계에 대한 시사 또한 간과할 수 없음을 확인한다. 이어서 관료가 현실에서처하게 되는 원자론적 혹은 구조론적 맥락에 따른 적극행정의 실천방향에 관해 논의한다. 결론적으로향후 적극행정의 실천은 한국이 처한 시대적 맥락과 관료가 처한 제도적 맥락을 동시에 고려하면서 모색되어야 함을 지적한다.

E-government innovations, which accompany both technological and administrative systems innovation, have often been driven more by technical fads than by social consensus. The structuration perspective on the adoption of technology has focused mainly on the organizational process, relatively ignoring the society-wide structuration that is more relevant to public organizations. In this paper, we focus on the structuration process of an e-government innovation, particularly the society-wide struct