[论文解读] Comment on "Tip induced unconventional superconductivity on Weyl semimetal TaAs" [arXiv:1607.00513]

Sirshendu Gayen, Leena Aggarwal+1 more|arXiv (Cornell University)|Jul 5, 2016

Topological Materials and Phenomena参考文献 5被引用 4

一句话总结

此评论挑战了基于点接触谱学在TaAs中发现的针尖诱导非传统超导态及马约拉纳零能模的主张，认为所观测到的电导特征——平台、下陷和零偏压峰——源于非弹道、热力学区输运的伪影，而非本征的拓扑超导性。作者指出，若无弹道区测量与光谱验证，此类主张仍缺乏依据且可能具有误导性。

ABSTRACT

Recently, Wang $et$ $al.$ have reported the observation of "unconventional superconductivity" in the Weyl semimetal TaAs [arXiv:1607.00513]. The authors have written " extit{A conductance plateau and sharp double dips are observed in the point contact spectra, indicating p-wave like unconventional superconductivity. Furthermore, the zero bias conductance peak in low temperature regime is detected, suggesting potentially the existence of Majorana zero modes. The experimentally observed tunneling spectra can be interpreted with a novel mirror-symmetry protected topological superconductor induced in TaAs, which can exhibit zero bias and double finite bias peaks, and double conductance dips in the measurements}." In this comment we show that for a superconducting point contact, the features like a zero-bias conductance peak, a plateau and single or multiple conductance dips might arise due to simple contact-heating related effects. Such features are routinely observed in point contacts involving a wide variety of superconductors when the experiments are not performed in the right regime of mesoscopic transport. We also show that the data presented by Wang $et$ $al.$ in a single transport regime of point contact do not confirm tip induced superconductivity (TISC). Even if it is assumed that Wang $et$ $al.$ achieved TISC on TaAs, all the spectra that they have reported show striking similarities with the type of spectra expected in thermal regime of transport. Such data cannot be used for extracting any spectroscopic information and based on such data any discussion on "p-wave" superconductivity or the emergence of Majorana modes should be considered invalid. This version (v2) also includes a brief discussion on the response of Wang $et$ $al.$ to the first version (v1) of this comment. Correct ballistic regime data on TaAs point contacts can be found in arXiv:1607.05131 (2016).

研究动机与目标

• 挑战将TaAs点接触谱学数据解释为针尖诱导非传统超导性的证据。
• 证明所报告的电导特征——平台、下陷和零偏压峰——是非弹道、热力学区输运的伪影。
• 强调若无适当的弹道区测量，p波超导性或马约拉纳模的主张无法得到验证。
• 强调严格实验协议（包括输运区控制）的必要性，以确认针尖诱导的超导相。
• 阐明点接触谱学在非理想输运条件下应用于拓扑材料时的局限性。

提出的方法

• 将TaAs点接触的实验谱与常规超导体（如Nb和Pb）在热力学区获得的谱进行比较。
• 分析温度依赖的电阻和电导谱，以识别非弹道输运的特征。
• 以BTK理论作为弹道Andreev反射的基准，与观测到的非弹道特征进行对比。
• 识别出多个电导下陷和零偏压峰为接触几何结构与热效应的伪影，而非拓扑超导性。
• 参考先前研究（如arXiv:1607.05131）中确立的实验检查清单，以毋庸置疑地确认针尖诱导的超导性。
• 批判原论文中自相矛盾的主张：一方面声称BTK模型适用于非传统超导性，另一方面BTK模型仅适用于常规超导体。

实验结果

研究问题

• RQ1 TaAs点接触中报告的电导平台和双下陷是否可由热力学区输运效应解释，而非拓扑超导性？
• RQ2 为何点接触电阻的温度依赖性与弹道输运不一致？这对其输运区意味着什么？
• RQ3 若Andreev反射需以超导配对的预先确认为前提，为何同一组数据可同时用于主张超导性和Andreev反射？
• RQ4 在非弹道接触中，零偏压峰和电导下陷等光谱特征在多大程度上模拟了拓扑超导体中预期的特征？
• RQ5 为何BTK模型（其不预测电导下陷）被用于解释包含此类特征的数据？

主要发现

• 在Nb和Pb等常规超导体中，于热力学区输运条件下，TaAs点接触中观测到的电导特征（如平台、下陷和零偏压峰）可被重现，表明这些特征是非弹道条件下的伪影。
• TaAs点接触中观测到的电阻转变无法与弹道输运相容，因为在该区域本征电阻率不应有贡献。
• 用于主张超导性的电阻温度依赖性，无法同时作为Andreev反射的证据，因为后者需以超导配对的预先确认为前提。
• BTK模型仅在Z=0且T=0时预测电导平台，无法解释观测到的多个下陷或非理想光谱特征，从而削弱其在解释该数据时的适用性。
• 声称p波样非传统超导性的主张与BTK模型相矛盾，因为BTK模型严格适用于常规超导体，且不预测电导下陷。
• arXiv:1607.05131中已存在TaAs点接触的正确弹道区数据，可确认超导性并支持光谱分析，凸显输运区控制的重要性。