Skip to main content
QUICK REVIEW

[Paper Review] Graphene-based enhancement of near-field radiative-heat-transfer rectification

Landrieux, Simon, Ben-Abdallah, Philippe|arXiv (Cornell University)|Feb 1, 2022
Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies64 references18 citations
TL;DR

This paper proposes a graphene-enhanced near-field radiative thermal rectifier using VO2 and SiO2 substrates, where tunable graphene sheets at optimal chemical potentials enhance rectification efficiency by up to 14% at 100 nm separation. The enhancement arises from graphene plasmons mediating stronger coupling between substrate surface modes, inducing a transition from 1/d² to 1/d power-law dependence in heat flux, which maximizes asymmetry under temperature reversal.

ABSTRACT

International audience

Motivation & Objective

  • To enhance near-field radiative heat transfer (RHT) rectification in a VO2/SiO2 heterostructure using graphene as a tunable mediator.
  • To address the inefficiency caused by mismatched surface resonances between dissimilar materials in thermal rectifiers.
  • To optimize graphene chemical potentials for maximum rectification efficiency across varying vacuum gaps.
  • To investigate the role of graphene plasmons in modifying spectral and distance-dependent RHT characteristics.
  • To identify the physical origin of non-monotonic efficiency behavior with respect to separation distance.

Proposed method

  • Modeling a two-body system with VO2 and SiO2 substrates separated by a vacuum gap, each coated with a monolayer graphene sheet.
  • Using Landauer-like decomposition of radiative heat flux: Φ = ∫₀^∞ dω/(2π) ∆Θ(ω) ∑ₚ ∫ d²k/(2π)² Tₚ(ω,k), where Tₚ is the transmission coefficient.
  • Calculating reflection coefficients for graphene-covered surfaces using frequency- and wavevector-dependent surface conductivity σ(ω) and dielectric permittivity ϵm(ω).
  • Optimizing chemical potentials µVO2 and µSiO2 for each gap distance d to maximize rectification coefficient η = (ΦF − ΦB)/ΦF.
  • Analyzing spectral flux Φω and transmission TTM(ω,k) to identify mode coupling and resonance broadening effects.
  • Comparing power-law scaling of ΦF and ΦB with d to identify transitions from 1/d² to 1/d behavior in the electrostatic regime.

Experimental results

Research questions

  • RQ1How does graphene coating affect the rectification coefficient of a VO2/SiO2-based near-field thermal diode?
  • RQ2What is the role of graphene plasmons in enhancing coupling between surface modes of VO2 and SiO2?
  • RQ3Why does the rectification efficiency exhibit a non-monotonic dependence on vacuum gap distance?
  • RQ4How does the power-law scaling of heat flux (1/d² vs. 1/d) relate to the efficiency enhancement?
  • RQ5Can optimal chemical potentials for graphene be tuned to maximize rectification across different separation distances?

Key findings

  • The rectification coefficient η increases by up to 14% at a 100 nm gap when graphene chemical potentials are optimized, compared to the uncoated system.
  • The enhancement is primarily due to increased forward heat flux ΦF, while backward flux ΦB remains largely unchanged, due to resonant coupling between graphene plasmons and substrate modes.
  • Spectral analysis reveals broadened and more intense resonant modes in the forward configuration with graphene, especially in the 0.8–1.7×10¹⁴ rad/s range.
  • A transition from 1/d² to 1/d power-law scaling of ΦF occurs below ~35 nm in the optimal graphene configuration, which enhances rectification efficiency at intermediate distances.
  • The non-monotonic behavior of η with decreasing d arises because the 1/d transition in ΦF brings it closer to ΦB at very small gaps, reducing asymmetry despite higher absolute flux.
  • The characteristic distance of the 1/d transition depends on the chemical potentials, with lower µ values shifting the transition to smaller d, but at the cost of mode detuning.

Better researchstarts right now

From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.

No credit card · Free plan available

This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.