[Paper Review] Interpretable to Whom? A Role-based Model for Analyzing Interpretable Machine Learning Systems
The paper proposes a role-based model to analyze interpretability in machine learning systems by identifying different agent roles and examining how these roles shape interpretability goals.
Several researchers have argued that a machine learning system's interpretability should be defined in relation to a specific agent or task: we should not ask if the system is interpretable, but to whom is it interpretable. We describe a model intended to help answer this question, by identifying different roles that agents can fulfill in relation to the machine learning system. We illustrate the use of our model in a variety of scenarios, exploring how an agent's role influences its goals, and the implications for defining interpretability. Finally, we make suggestions for how our model could be useful to interpretability researchers, system developers, and regulatory bodies auditing machine learning systems.
Motivation & Objective
- Motivate that interpretability is relative to a specific agent or task, not a universal property.
- Introduce a role-based model to identify agent roles related to a ML system.
- Illustrate how an agent's role shapes interpretability goals and requirements.
- Discuss implications for researchers, system developers, and regulatory auditing of ML systems.
Proposed method
- Define a role-based framework to categorize agents interacting with ML systems.
- Analyze scenarios to show how an agent’s role affects interpretability objectives.
- Discuss implications for defining interpretability across different stakeholder roles.
Experimental results
Research questions
- RQ1What are the agent roles that interact with ML systems relevant to interpretability?
- RQ2How do different agent roles influence interpretability goals and assessments?
- RQ3What are the broader implications for research, development, and regulation of interpretable ML?
Key findings
- A role-based perspective helps explain why interpretability is not a single property but depends on the agent and context.
- Illustrative scenarios demonstrate how an agent’s goals alter what counts as interpretable.
- The model has implications for how interpretability is defined, evaluated, and audited across stakeholders.
- The authors provide guidance on how the model can be useful to interpretability researchers, system developers, and regulatory bodies.
Better researchstarts right now
From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.
No credit card · Free plan available
This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.