Skip to main content
QUICK REVIEW

[Paper Review] Kernel classification of connectomes based on earth mover's distance between graph spectra

Yulia Dodonova, Mikhail Belyaev|arXiv (Cornell University)|Nov 27, 2016
Advanced Graph Neural Networks10 references3 citations
TL;DR

This paper proposes a kernel-based machine learning approach for classifying structural connectomes using earth mover's distance (EMD) between normalized Laplacian spectral distributions. By computing EMD on eigenvalue distributions of brain networks, the method constructs a robust kernel for SVM classification, achieving an AUC of 0.71 in distinguishing autism spectrum disorder from typical development, outperforming baseline graph embedding methods.

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we tackle a problem of predicting phenotypes from structural connectomes. We propose that normalized Laplacian spectra can capture structural properties of brain networks, and hence graph spectral distributions are useful for a task of connectome-based classification. We introduce a kernel that is based on earth mover's distance (EMD) between spectral distributions of brain networks. We access performance of an SVM classifier with the proposed kernel for a task of classification of autism spectrum disorder versus typical development based on a publicly available dataset. Classification quality (area under the ROC-curve) obtained with the EMD-based kernel on spectral distributions is 0.71, which is higher than that based on simpler graph embedding methods.

Motivation & Objective

  • To improve classification of brain connectomes by capturing structural network properties through spectral analysis.
  • To develop a kernel method that effectively compares spectral distributions of brain networks without requiring density estimation.
  • To evaluate the performance of the proposed EMD-based kernel on a real connectome dataset for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) classification.
  • To demonstrate that spectral distributions of normalized Laplacian matrices encode meaningful structural differences between normal and pathological brain networks.

Proposed method

  • The normalized Laplacian matrix is computed from weighted, undirected connectome graphs using adjacency and degree matrices.
  • The eigenvalue distributions of the normalized Laplacian are extracted as spectral representations of brain networks.
  • Earth mover's distance (EMD) is used to compute pairwise distances between empirical spectral distributions, capturing shape and location differences.
  • A kernel matrix is constructed using the EMD distances, enabling the use of kernelized SVM for classification.
  • The method is applied to a public connectome dataset with connectomes weighted by both streamline count and physical distance to reduce tractography bias.
  • Classification performance is evaluated via 100-fold cross-validation with area under the ROC curve (AUC) as the primary metric.

Experimental results

Research questions

  • RQ1Can spectral distributions of the normalized Laplacian matrix effectively represent structural properties of brain networks for classification tasks?
  • RQ2Does EMD between spectral distributions outperform simpler graph embedding methods in connectome classification?
  • RQ3How does incorporating both connection strength and physical length in connectome weighting affect classification performance?
  • RQ4Is the EMD-based kernel more robust than probabilistic kernel methods in capturing differences in spectral distributions?

Key findings

  • The EMD-based kernel achieved an average AUC of 0.706 with a standard deviation of 0.022 across 100 runs, indicating robust performance.
  • The method outperformed baseline approaches using linear kernels on raw eigenvalues or edge vectors, confirming the advantage of spectral-based EMD.
  • The Gram matrix revealed that ASD subjects were more similar to each other, while TD subjects showed higher pairwise variability in spectral distributions.
  • The classifier demonstrated higher recall (0.737) for ASD detection but lower precision (0.670) for TD subjects, indicating a tendency to misclassify TD as ASD.
  • The EMD kernel does not require density reconstruction of empirical eigenvalue distributions, making it more robust than probabilistic distance metrics.

Better researchstarts right now

From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.

No credit card · Free plan available

This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.