Skip to main content
QUICK REVIEW

[Paper Review] SMASH: One-Shot Model Architecture Search through HyperNetworks

Andrew Brock, Theodore Lim|arXiv (Cornell University)|Aug 17, 2017
Machine Learning and Data Classification32 references392 citations
TL;DR

SMASH trains a HyperNet to generate weights for variable-architecture networks, enabling one-shot ranking of many architectures via a single training run. It evaluates architectures by the HyperNet-generated weights to select promising designs for full training.

ABSTRACT

Designing architectures for deep neural networks requires expert knowledge and substantial computation time. We propose a technique to accelerate architecture selection by learning an auxiliary HyperNet that generates the weights of a main model conditioned on that model's architecture. By comparing the relative validation performance of networks with HyperNet-generated weights, we can effectively search over a wide range of architectures at the cost of a single training run. To facilitate this search, we develop a flexible mechanism based on memory read-writes that allows us to define a wide range of network connectivity patterns, with ResNet, DenseNet, and FractalNet blocks as special cases. We validate our method (SMASH) on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100, STL-10, ModelNet10, and Imagenet32x32, achieving competitive performance with similarly-sized hand-designed networks. Our code is available at https://github.com/ajbrock/SMASH

Motivation & Objective

  • Motivate reducing architectural search cost by avoiding full training of every candidate.
  • Propose a flexible memory-bank based encoding to represent diverse network connectivities.
  • Introduce a Dynamic HyperNet that maps architecture encodings to weights for the main network.
  • Investigate correlation between SMASH proxy performance and truly trained performance across datasets.
  • Explore transferability of found architectures across datasets and domains.

Proposed method

  • Define a memory-bank view of networks to encode variable depth and connectivity as binary vectors.
  • Train a HyperNet to map architecture encodings to the weights of a main network, enabling weight generation conditioned on architecture.
  • During SMASH training, sample architectures, generate their weights via the HyperNet, and backpropagate through the whole system.
  • Evaluate a set of architectures on a validation set using HyperNet-generated weights to rank them for full training.
  • Fix the best-scoring architecture and train it with freely learned weights for final evaluation.

Experimental results

Research questions

  • RQ1Does the SMASH-generated weight proxy correlate with performance of fully trained architectures?
  • RQ2Can SMASH reliably rank a wide range of architectures using a single training run?
  • RQ3How does the architecture search via SMASH transfer to different datasets and domains?
  • RQ4What is the effect of HyperNet capacity on the reliability of SMASH scores?
  • RQ5Can the learned architecture-to-weights mapping be exploited for gradient-like guidance in architecture space?

Key findings

  • There is a observed correlation between SMASH scores and true validation performance in CIFAR-100 under certain training configurations.
  • Reduced-capacity HyperNets can break the correlation between SMASH scores and true performance.
  • When the majority of capacity is in fixed (non-generated) weights, SMASH scoring may not predict architectural performance well.
  • AMethods that corrupt the architecture encoding during evaluation degrade validation performance, suggesting the HyperNet learns architecture-conditioned weights.
  • Best-performing SMASHv2 architectures achieved competitive results on CIFAR-10/100 and Imagenet32x32 compared to some hand-designed networks and other NAS methods.
  • Transfer of found CIFAR-based architectures to STL-10 and ModelNet10 showed mixed results, indicating larger datasets may improve architecture discrimination.

Better researchstarts right now

From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.

No credit card · Free plan available

This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.