[Paper Review] Bayesian analysis of multimessenger M-R data with interpolated hybrid EoS
This paper presents a Bayesian analysis of multimessenger neutron star data using a novel two-zone parabolic interpolation between a soft hadronic EoS (APR) and a stiff color-superconducting quark matter EoS based on a nonlocal NJL model with two free parameters (ηD, ηV). The key result is that the data strongly favor a color-superconducting quark phase with ηD ≈ 0.75, and the most probable EoS cannot support a maximum mass above 2.5 M⊙, implying GW190814 was likely a binary black hole merger rather than a neutron star–black hole system.
We introduce a family of equations of state (EoS) for hybrid neutron star (NS) matter that is obtained by a two-zone parabolic interpolation between a soft hadronic EoS at low densities and a set of stiff quark matter EoS at high densities within a finite region of chemical potentials $\mu_H < \mu < \mu_Q$. Fixing the hadronic EoS as the APR one and choosing the color-superconducting, nonlocal NJL model with two free parameters for the quark phase, we perform Bayesian analyses with this two-parameter family of hybrid EoS. Using three different sets of observational constraints that include the mass of PSR J0740+6620, the tidal deformability for GW170817, and the mass-radius relation for PSR J0030+0451 from NICER as obligatory (set 1), while set 2 uses the possible upper limit on the maximum mass from GW170817 as an additional constraint and set 3 instead of the possibility that the lighter object in the asymmetric binary merger GW190814 is a neutron star. We confirm that in any case, the quark matter phase has to be color superconducting with the dimensionless diquark coupling approximately fulfilling the Fierz relation $\eta_D=0.75$ and the most probable solutions exhibiting a proportionality between $\eta_D$ and $\eta_V$, the coupling of the repulsive vector interaction that is required for a sufficiently large maximum mass. We used the Bayesian analysis to investigate with the method of fictitious measurements the consequences of anticipating different radii for the massive $2~M_\odot$ PSR J0740+6220 for the most likely equation of state. With the actual outcome of the NICER radius measurement on PSR J0740+6220 we could conclude that for the most likely hybrid star EoS would not support a maximum mass as large as $2.5~M_\odot$ so that the event GW190814 was a binary black hole merger.
Motivation & Objective
- To develop a flexible, physically motivated family of hybrid neutron star equations of state (EoS) using two-zone parabolic interpolation between hadronic and quark matter phases.
- To perform a Bayesian analysis of multimessenger constraints (mass, radius, tidal deformability) to infer posterior distributions over EoS parameters.
- To test the robustness of EoS constraints under different observational assumptions, including the nature of the compact object in GW190814.
- To assess the predictive power of the method using fictitious NICER radius measurements for PSR J0740+6620.
- To determine whether the observed maximum mass of 2.14 M⊙ in PSR J0740+6620 is compatible with hybrid EoS models supporting higher masses.
Proposed method
- Construct a two-parameter family of hybrid EoS by interpolating between the soft APR EoS at low densities and a nonlocal NJL model for color-superconducting quark matter at high densities.
- Use a parabolic interpolation in chemical potential space between µH = 991 MeV (n ≈ 1.5n₀) and µQ, ensuring smooth transition and avoiding unphysical reconfinement.
- Apply Bayesian inference with three distinct observational constraint sets: (1) PSR J0740+6620 mass, GW170817 tidal deformability, and NICER J0030+0451 radius; (2) adds upper limit on Mmax from GW170817; (3) assumes GW190814's lighter component is a neutron star.
- Use the method of fictitious measurements to simulate future NICER radius measurements for PSR J0740+6620 and assess their impact on EoS inference.
- Compute posterior probabilities for EoS models and compare results across constraint sets using relative posterior normalization.
- Analyze the resulting M–R sequences, EoS pressure–energy density relations, and tidal deformability correlations (Λ1–Λ2) to extract physical constraints.
Experimental results
Research questions
- RQ1Can a two-zone parabolic interpolation between hadronic and quark matter EoS produce physically viable hybrid stars without unphysical reconfinement?
- RQ2What are the posterior constraints on the diquark coupling (ηD) and vector interaction strength (ηV) in a color-superconducting quark matter phase?
- RQ3Does the inclusion of the PSR J0740+6620 mass and radius as constraints favor EoS models with higher maximum masses?
- RQ4Is the observed mass of 2.14 M⊙ in PSR J0740+6620 compatible with hybrid EoS models that also satisfy GW170817 and NICER constraints?
- RQ5What is the likelihood that GW190814 was a neutron star–black hole merger, given the inferred EoS constraints?
Key findings
- The Bayesian analysis favors a color-superconducting quark matter phase with the diquark coupling ηD ≈ 0.75, consistent with the Fierz relation.
- The most probable EoS solutions exhibit a strong correlation between ηD and ηV, where the repulsive vector interaction (ηV) is essential for achieving a sufficiently large maximum neutron star mass.
- The inferred EoS family cannot support a maximum mass exceeding 2.5 M⊙, which rules out the scenario that GW190814 involved a neutron star with mass ≈2.6 M⊙.
- The actual NICER radius measurement for PSR J0740+6620 (R ≈ 11.4 km) implies that the most likely hybrid EoS would not support a 2.5 M⊙ star, reinforcing the conclusion that GW190814 was likely a binary black hole merger.
- The method of fictitious measurements successfully predicts that future NICER radius measurements for PSR J0740+6620 would significantly constrain the EoS, especially in the high-density regime.
- The relative posterior probability of the present EoS model family is more than five times higher than that of a previous model (Ref. [11]) when using the same set of constraints (set 1), indicating improved data compatibility.
Better researchstarts right now
From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.
No credit card · Free plan available
This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.