Skip to main content
QUICK REVIEW

[Paper Review] sharpDARTS: Faster and More Accurate Differentiable Architecture Search

Andrew Hundt, Varun Jain|arXiv (Cornell University)|Mar 23, 2019
Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsComputer Science27 references35 citations
TL;DR

sharpDARTS improves differentiable architecture search by introducing SharpSepConv, a Cosine Power Annealing learning rate schedule, and Max-W regularization, achieving faster search and higher accuracy on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-10.1, and competitive ImageNet results.

ABSTRACT

Neural Architecture Search (NAS) has been a source of dramatic improvements in neural network design, with recent results meeting or exceeding the performance of hand-tuned architectures. However, our understanding of how to represent the search space for neural net architectures and how to search that space efficiently are both still in their infancy. We have performed an in-depth analysis to identify limitations in a widely used search space and a recent architecture search method, Differentiable Architecture Search (DARTS). These findings led us to introduce novel network blocks with a more general, balanced, and consistent design; a better-optimized Cosine Power Annealing learning rate schedule; and other improvements. Our resulting sharpDARTS search is 50% faster with a 20-30% relative improvement in final model error on CIFAR-10 when compared to DARTS. Our best single model run has 1.93% (1.98+/-0.07) validation error on CIFAR-10 and 5.5% error (5.8+/-0.3) on the recently released CIFAR-10.1 test set. To our knowledge, both are state of the art for models of similar size. This model also generalizes competitively to ImageNet at 25.1% top-1 (7.8% top-5) error. We found improvements for existing search spaces but does DARTS generalize to new domains? We propose Differentiable Hyperparameter Grid Search and the HyperCuboid search space, which are representations designed to leverage DARTS for more general parameter optimization. Here we find that DARTS fails to generalize when compared against a human's one shot choice of models. We look back to the DARTS and sharpDARTS search spaces to understand why, and an ablation study reveals an unusual generalization gap. We finally propose Max-W regularization to solve this problem, which proves significantly better than the handmade design. Code will be made available.

Motivation & Objective

  • Identify limitations in existing NAS search spaces and DARTS methods.
  • Develop a more balanced and efficient search space and training regimen.
  • Improve generalization and search efficiency for mobile-scale architectures.

Proposed method

  • Propose SharpSepConv block with balanced depth and bottlenecks to equalize operation counts.
  • Introduce Cosine Power Annealing learning rate schedule to maintain effective learning rates during training.
  • Define Differentiable Hyperparameter Grid Search and HyperCuboid search space for evaluating discrete choices.
  • Perform ablations to identify biases in DARTS and introduce Max-W regularization to mitigate them.

Experimental results

Research questions

  • RQ1Does the DARTS search space have biases that limit generalization to new domains?
  • RQ2Can SharpSepConv and the improved training regimen yield faster search with higher final accuracy on CIFAR-10/10.1 and ImageNet?
  • RQ3Does Max-W regularization improve architecture search by mitigating bias toward low-capacity primitives?

Key findings

  • SharpSepConv and sharpDARTS achieve state-of-the-art mobile-scale results on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-10.1, with notable reductions in search time.
  • Cosine Power Annealing maintains more optimal learning rates, improving training dynamics over standard Cosine Annealing.
  • Max-W regularization reduces bias toward high-gradient, small-primitives, enabling larger, more accurate models.
  • Differentiable Hyperparameter Grid Search and HyperCuboid space reveal generalization gaps in DARTS across spaces.
  • Handmade and Max-W-regularized approaches can outperform scalar DARTS in some settings, highlighting search-space and optimization biases.

Better researchstarts right now

From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.

No credit card · Free plan available

This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.