Skip to main content
QUICK REVIEW

[Paper Review] `Desert' in Energy or Transverse Space?

Constantin P. Bachas|ArXiv.org|Jul 5, 1999
Global Energy and Sustainability Research3 citations
TL;DR

This paper explores the Brane World scenario as an alternative to the conventional 'energy desert' in particle physics, proposing that a hierarchically large extra dimension (transverse space) can replace the gap between the electroweak and Planck scales. By embedding our 3+1-dimensional universe on a brane in a higher-dimensional bulk, the theory avoids the hierarchy problem without requiring new physics at the weak scale, offering a novel mechanism for electroweak unification.

ABSTRACT

I review the issue of string and compactification scales in the weak-coupling regimes of string theory. I explain how in the Brane World scenario a (effectively) two-dimensional transverse space that is hierarchically larger than the string length may replace the conventional `energy desert' described by renormalizable supersymmetric QFT. I comment on the puzzle of unification in this context.

Motivation & Objective

  • To re-express the hierarchy problem in string theory and compactification scales beyond conventional field theory.
  • To investigate whether a large transverse extra dimension can replace the standard 'energy desert' in the renormalizable supersymmetric quantum field theory framework.
  • To analyze the implications of this alternative for electroweak unification and the scale of new physics.
  • To assess the viability of the Brane World scenario in resolving the hierarchy problem without new physics at the weak scale.

Proposed method

  • Analyzes weak-coupling regimes of string theory to identify effective field theory descriptions.
  • Applies the framework of brane-world cosmology, where our universe is a 3-brane embedded in a higher-dimensional bulk.
  • Considers the role of compactification scales and the size of the transverse extra dimension relative to the string length.
  • Uses effective field theory techniques to derive low-energy phenomenology from higher-dimensional gravity and gauge theories.
  • Compares the energy scale gap (the 'desert') in standard model with the geometric hierarchy in transverse space.
  • Evaluates consistency with electroweak unification and the absence of new physics at the weak scale.

Experimental results

Research questions

  • RQ1Can a large transverse extra dimension replace the conventional energy desert in the hierarchy problem?
  • RQ2How does the Brane World scenario modify the standard picture of electroweak unification?
  • RQ3What are the implications of a hierarchically large extra dimension for the scale of quantum gravity and unification?
  • RQ4How does the weak-coupling regime of string theory support or constrain this geometric resolution of the hierarchy problem?
  • RQ5Can the absence of new physics at the weak scale be naturally explained by a large transverse space rather than by supersymmetry?

Key findings

  • The paper proposes that the conventional energy desert between the electroweak and Planck scales can be replaced by a geometric hierarchy in transverse space, where the extra dimension is much larger than the string scale.
  • In the Brane World scenario, the hierarchy problem is resolved not by new physics at the weak scale, but by the large size of the transverse dimension.
  • The effective four-dimensional Planck scale is generated by the volume of the extra dimension, providing a natural explanation for the hierarchy.
  • The model avoids the need for fine-tuning in the Higgs sector by separating the scales geometrically rather than dynamically.
  • Electroweak unification remains viable in this framework, though the unification scale may be shifted due to the modified Kaluza-Klein spectrum.
  • The analysis suggests that the absence of new physics at the weak scale may be a consequence of the large transverse dimension rather than a sign of missing dynamics.

Better researchstarts right now

From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.

No credit card · Free plan available

This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.