Skip to main content
QUICK REVIEW

[Paper Review] A spark-resistant bulk-micromegas chamber for high-rate applications

J. Burnens, R. De Oliveira|arXiv (Cornell University)|Nov 24, 2010
Particle Detector Development and Performance1 references4 citations
TL;DR

This paper presents a spark-resistant bulk-micromegas chamber design using resistive strips on a printed circuit board to suppress high-voltage breakdowns in high-rate environments. By isolating readout strips with a resistive layer connected to ground through high-value resistors, the chamber achieves stable operation at gas gains up to 30,000 and withstands neutron fluxes up to 1.5×10⁶ cm⁻²s⁻¹ without HV breakdowns, even under extreme particle rates of 1 MHz/cm².

ABSTRACT

We report on the design and performance of a spark-resistant bulk-micromegas chamber. The principle of this design lends itself to the construction of large-area muon chambers for the upgrade of the detectors at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN for luminosities in excess of 10**34/cm2/s or other high-rate applications.

Motivation & Objective

  • To develop a spark-resistant bulk-micromegas chamber for high-rate applications in high-luminosity LHC upgrades.
  • To address the risk of HV breakdown caused by ionizing debris from neutron interactions and minimum-ionizing particles.
  • To maintain high spatial resolution and detection efficiency under extreme particle fluxes and high gas gains.
  • To enable stable operation in environments with particle rates exceeding 1 MHz/cm² and neutron fluxes up to 1.5×10⁶ cm⁻²s⁻¹.
  • To demonstrate that spark-induced HV breakdowns no longer limit detector performance in high-rate scenarios.

Proposed method

  • A resistive protection layer (64 µm thick, 1–10 MΩ/cm resistivity) is deposited on top of 18 µm copper readout strips on a PCB.
  • Resistive strips (150 µm wide, 250 µm pitch) are patterned to match the readout strips and connected to ground via 15–50 MΩ resistors.
  • A 128 µm-distant stainless steel mesh (400 lines/inch, 18 µm wire) is supported by 400 µm-diameter photoimageable coverlay pillars at 2.5 mm intervals.
  • The drift electrode is a 5 mm distant stainless steel mesh (350 lines/inch, 22 µm wire), forming a 4–5 mm drift gap.
  • The chamber is sealed with an O-ring and Kapton foil windows to maintain gas tightness.
  • The design prevents charge spreading and limits discharge energy by confining current to individual resistive strips.

Experimental results

Research questions

  • RQ1Can a resistive strip layer on the readout plane effectively suppress HV breakdowns in bulk-micromegas chambers under high-rate particle irradiation?
  • RQ2How does the resistive layer design affect the chamber's ability to maintain high gas gain while preventing spark propagation?
  • RQ3What is the maximum particle rate and neutron flux the chamber can withstand without HV breakdown or performance degradation?
  • RQ4Does the resistive protection scheme preserve spatial resolution and detection efficiency compared to non-resistive micromegas?
  • RQ5How does the choice of gas mixture (e.g., 80:20 vs. 93:7 Ar:CO₂) influence the spark rate under neutron irradiation?

Key findings

  • The resistive chamber design successfully prevented HV breakdowns during exposure to 120 GeV/c pion beams at rates up to 30 kHz over 2–3 cm², with no breakdowns observed over several days.
  • The chamber operated stably at gas gains up to 30,000 and maintained signal integrity with less than 30% signal degradation at particle rates up to 1 MHz/cm².
  • Under neutron irradiation at 1.5×10⁶ cm⁻²s⁻¹, the spark rate per incident neutron was reduced to a few ×10⁻⁸ in 93:7 Ar:CO₂ gas, representing a fivefold reduction compared to 80:20 Ar:CO₂.
  • Sparks in the resistive chambers produced currents below 300 nA, and the mesh voltage dropped only transiently at gains above 1.5×10⁴, indicating effective energy dissipation.
  • No significant differences in spatial resolution, efficiency, or data quality were observed between the three resistive chambers tested, confirming consistent performance.
  • The non-resistive chamber suffered repeated HV breakdowns under identical beam conditions, confirming the effectiveness of the resistive protection scheme.

Better researchstarts right now

From reading papers to final review, dramatically reduce your research time.

No credit card · Free plan available

This review was created by AI and reviewed by human editors.